Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make pkg/certman2 independent from CML and internal packages #428

Open
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

MartinWeindel
Copy link
Member

How to categorize this PR?

/kind task

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR are a series of refactorings to remove dependencies to controller-manager-library and other internal packages from the pkg/certman2 package tree.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

NONE

@gardener-prow gardener-prow bot added the kind/task General task label Feb 26, 2025
Copy link

gardener-prow bot commented Feb 26, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from martinweindel. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@gardener-prow gardener-prow bot added cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the cla-assistant.io CLA. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 26, 2025
@gardener-prow gardener-prow bot requested a review from marc1404 February 26, 2025 17:05
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Feb 26, 2025
@MartinWeindel MartinWeindel marked this pull request as draft February 26, 2025 17:18
@gardener-prow gardener-prow bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 26, 2025
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Feb 26, 2025
@MartinWeindel
Copy link
Member Author

/ok-to-test

@gardener-prow gardener-prow bot added the ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. label Feb 26, 2025
@MartinWeindel
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cert-management-e2e-kind

@MartinWeindel
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cert-management-unit

@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Feb 27, 2025
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Feb 27, 2025
@MartinWeindel
Copy link
Member Author

/ok-to-test

1 similar comment
@MartinWeindel
Copy link
Member Author

/ok-to-test

@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Feb 27, 2025
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Feb 27, 2025
@MartinWeindel
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cert-management-unit

@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Feb 27, 2025
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Feb 27, 2025
@MartinWeindel MartinWeindel marked this pull request as ready for review February 27, 2025 13:34
@gardener-prow gardener-prow bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 27, 2025
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Feb 27, 2025
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Feb 27, 2025
Copy link
Member

@marc1404 marc1404 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall it looks great, thanks for improving the structure of the packages!

I have one uncertainty about a renamed test which might be a leftover

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This renaming seems like an unintentional leftover 🤔

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the cla-assistant.io CLA. kind/task General task needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants