Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: upgrade testflight workflow macos image #4900

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 26, 2025

Conversation

armcknight
Copy link
Member

I got the TestFlight emails for the iOS-Swift sample app, which contained:

ITMS-90725: SDK version issue - This app was built with the iOS 17.2 SDK. Starting April 24, 2025, all iOS and iPadOS apps must be built with the iOS 18 SDK or later, included in Xcode 16 or later, in order to be uploaded to App Store Connect or submitted for distribution.

We use macos-13 which only supports up to iOS 17.2. Upgrading to macos-14 satisfies the requirement to support 18.

#skip-changelog

Copy link
Member

@philipphofmann philipphofmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@philipphofmann
Copy link
Member

I merged this cause we're getting annoying emails from Apple telling us we should compile the sample app with iOS 18.

@philipphofmann philipphofmann merged commit 111ea41 into main Feb 26, 2025
9 checks passed
@philipphofmann philipphofmann deleted the armcknight/test/ios-sdk-version branch February 26, 2025 18:49
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ on:
jobs:
upload_to_testflight:
name: Build and Upload iOS-Swift to Testflight
runs-on: macos-13
runs-on: macos-14
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- run: ./scripts/ci-select-xcode.sh 15.2
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We also need to switch to Xcode 16.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants