t: port reftable/readwrite_test.c to the unit testing framework #1770
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Chand-ra
force-pushed
the
readwrite
branch
3 times, most recently
from
e4b01cd
to
3f571c0
Compare
added 4 commits
August 12, 2024 20:07
reftable/readwrite_test.c exercises the functions defined in
reftable/reader.{c,h} and reftable/writer.{c,h}. Migrate
reftable/readwrite_test.c to the unit testing framework. Migration
involves refactoring the tests to use the unit testing framework
instead of reftable's test framework and renaming the tests to
align with unit-tests' naming conventions.
Since some tests in reftable/readwrite_test.c use the functions
set_test_hash(), noop_flush() and strbuf_add_void() defined in
reftable/test_framework.{c,h} but these files are not #included
in the ported unit test, copy these functions in the new test file.
While at it, ensure structs are 0-initialized with '= { 0 }'
instead of '= { NULL }'.
Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <[email protected]>
Mentored-by: Christian Couder <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chandra Pratap <[email protected]>
free_names() as defined by reftable/basics.{c,h} frees a NULL
terminated array of malloced strings along with the array itself.
Use this function instead of a for loop to free such an array.
Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <[email protected]>
Mentored-by: Christian Couder <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chandra Pratap <[email protected]>
Using a for loop with an empty conditional statement is more concise and easier to read than an infinite 'while' loop in instances where we need a loop variable. Hence, replace such instances of a 'while' loop with the equivalent 'for' loop. Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <[email protected]> Mentored-by: Christian Couder <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Chandra Pratap <[email protected]>
When using reftable_writer_add_ref() to add a ref record to a reftable writer, The update_index of the ref record must be within the limits set by reftable_writer_set_limits(), or REFTABLE_API_ERROR is returned. This scenario is currently left untested. Add a test case for the same. Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <[email protected]> Mentored-by: Christian Couder <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Chandra Pratap <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.