Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
NUGN580: Ends report 3 and creates report 4
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
glher committed Sep 29, 2016
1 parent ed07bbf commit 6d61ba8
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 37 changed files with 3,234 additions and 92 deletions.
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ \section{Neutron count rate}

Plotting $\frac{1}{M}$, i.e. the change in the count rate, as a function of the number of fuel elements in the core, will allow prediction of the number of elements needed to reach criticality.

However, in order for the measurements to be correct, it is necessary to place the source in a position where it won't mask the neutron flux from this addition to the neutron detector. A more detailed point will be made about this in \ref{}.
However, in order for the measurements to be correct, it is necessary to place the source in a position where it won't mask the neutron flux from this addition to the neutron detector. A more detailed point will be made about this in the next section.

\section{Procedure}

Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -63,4 +63,10 @@ \section{Criticality prediction}
\rho = 3.88 - 3.088 - 0.04 = 0.752
\end{equation}

\section{Uncertainties}

At several occurences, data was recorded when the reactor was not yet stabilized. This can be seen especially for 120 and 123 fuel elements in the core, with a consequential dip in the values. Averaged over 20 data points (approximately a minute worth of data), the effect is marginal, especially when compared to the inherent uncertainties of the system, be it the fuel rods mass and burnup variations, their locations with relation to the source and the detector, ...

The linearity of the linear regression is quite approximative, with a $R^2$ value of 97\%. However, the goal in such experiments is not quite to obtain a predicted number of fuel elements needed as close as possible to reality, but primarily to be conservative during our approach. Figure~\ref{fig:prediction} shows that this goal was perfectly met.


Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -5,9 +5,11 @@
\chapter{Conclusion}
\label{chap:conclusion}

\initial{T}he USGS TRIGA research nuclear reactor (GSTR) have been used to irradiate a sample in order to determine its isotopic composition. While this method can also give the quantities (mass) of each nucleide in the sample, only an energy calibration of the spectrometer was performed, rendering this information unavailable. Instead, the elements in the sample have been identified, using the activated sample activity and a spectrometry.
\initial{A}n approach to criticality was performed on the USGS TRIGA reactor core, from a fuel mass point of view. Fifteen fuel elements were taken out of the core and progressively put back in while surveilling the neutron count rate to predict the number of fuel elements needed to reach criticality.

The sample was found to have a 36 minutes half-life. The spectrometry generated low confidence data, due to potential ongoing work on the library. Nonetheless, if the results from the measurements are considered correct within the usual 1 keV uncertainty, it has been derived that the sample contained Hafnium and Gadolinium mostly, with an accumulation of Tantalum probably caused by the activation of Hafnium.
It was seen that the approach taken was conservative, the prediction of the number of fuel rods to reach criticality being systematically underestimated. This has to do with the reloading pattern. Indeed, if by chance the least reactive fuel rods had all been inserted first, the operators could have assumed that they were far from criticality and decided to speed up the process by reloading more of the most reactive fuel elements at once, thus achieving criticality earlier than anticipated.

A full core was not necessary to obtain a critical mass, since the core went critical with one fuel element, worth 75 cents, to spare.

%=======

1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions NUGN580/Report3_Approach-Critical/project.aux
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2.2}{\ignorespaces Evolution of the criticality prediction}}{7}{figure.2.2}}
\newlabel{fig:prediction}{{\M@TitleReference {2.2}{Evolution of the criticality prediction}}{7}{Evolution of the criticality prediction}{figure.2.2}{}}
\newlabel{eq8}{{2.1}{7}{Criticality prediction}{equation.2.2.1}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2.3}Uncertainties}{7}{section.2.3}}
\@writefile{lof}{\addvspace {10pt}}
\@writefile{lot}{\addvspace {10pt}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {chapter}{\chapternumberline {3}Conclusion}{9}{chapter.3}}
Expand Down
114 changes: 33 additions & 81 deletions NUGN580/Report3_Approach-Critical/project.log
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.14159265-2.6-1.40.16 (TeX Live 2015/Debian) (preloaded format=pdflatex 2016.8.24) 23 SEP 2016 10:11
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.14159265-2.6-1.40.16 (TeX Live 2015/Debian) (preloaded format=pdflatex 2016.8.24) 27 SEP 2016 16:03
entering extended mode
restricted \write18 enabled.
%&-line parsing enabled.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1843,7 +1843,7 @@ LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `T1/fnc/m/n' will be
(Font) scaled to size 11.15991pt on input line 30.
LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `T1/fnc/m/sc' will be
(Font) scaled to size 11.15991pt on input line 32.
<logos/CSM.png, id=39, 306.14375pt x 309.155pt>
<logos/CSM.png, id=79, 306.14375pt x 309.155pt>
File: logos/CSM.png Graphic file (type png)

<use logos/CSM.png>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1983,83 +1983,56 @@ LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `T1/fnc/m/n' will be
(Font) scaled to size 53.44917pt on input line 8.
LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `T1/fnc/m/sc' will be
(Font) scaled to size 53.44917pt on input line 8.


Package natbib Warning: Citation `reactor01' on page 1 undefined on input line
10.

[1
[1


]

LaTeX Warning: Reference `app:app01' on page 2 undefined on input line 54.

<chapters/chapter01/fig01/neupop.png, id=125, 602.25pt x 372.39125pt>
<chapters/chapter01/fig01/neupop.png, id=162, 602.25pt x 372.39125pt>
File: chapters/chapter01/fig01/neupop.png Graphic file (type png)

<use chapters/chapter01/fig01/neupop.png>
Package pdftex.def Info: chapters/chapter01/fig01/neupop.png used on input line
58.
(pdftex.def) Requested size: 411.82198pt x 254.63622pt.
LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `T1/fnc/m/n' will be
(Font) scaled to size 9.29993pt on input line 84.
(Font) scaled to size 9.29993pt on input line 85.
LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `T1/fnc/m/sc' will be
(Font) scaled to size 9.29993pt on input line 84.
(Font) scaled to size 9.29993pt on input line 85.
[2]

LaTeX Warning: Reference `' on page 3 undefined on input line 84.

<chapters/chapter01/fig01/goodbaddet.png, id=138, 621.32124pt x 197.73875pt>
<chapters/chapter01/fig01/goodbaddet.png, id=176, 621.32124pt x 197.73875pt>
File: chapters/chapter01/fig01/goodbaddet.png Graphic file (type png)

<use chapters/chapter01/fig01/goodbaddet.png>
Package pdftex.def Info: chapters/chapter01/fig01/goodbaddet.png used on input
line 94.
(pdftex.def) Requested size: 400.0523pt x 127.3181pt.
[3 <./chapters/chapter01/fig01/neupop.png>]) (./chapters/chapter02/chap02.tex
[4 <./chapters/chapter01/fig01/goodbaddet.png>]

LaTeX Warning: Reference `tab:nm100_rawdata' on page 5 undefined on input line
12.
[4 <./chapters/chapter01/fig01/goodbaddet.png>] [5


LaTeX Warning: Reference `tab:nm1000_avg' on page 5 undefined on input line 12.



LaTeX Warning: Reference `fig:1overM' on page 5 undefined on input line 30.


LaTeX Warning: Reference `app:app04' on page 5 undefined on input line 30.

[5

] <chapters/chapter02/fig02/1overM.png, id=154, 602.25pt x 372.39125pt>
]
<chapters/chapter02/fig02/1overM.png, id=196, 602.25pt x 372.39125pt>
File: chapters/chapter02/fig02/1overM.png Graphic file (type png)

<use chapters/chapter02/fig02/1overM.png>
Package pdftex.def Info: chapters/chapter02/fig02/1overM.png used on input line
34.
(pdftex.def) Requested size: 411.82198pt x 254.63622pt.


LaTeX Warning: Reference `fig:prediction' on page 6 undefined on input line 41.


LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `T1/fnc/m/it' will be
(Font) scaled to size 10.18341pt on input line 41.
<chapters/chapter02/fig02/prediction.png, id=155, 602.25pt x 372.39125pt>

<chapters/chapter02/fig02/prediction.png, id=198, 602.25pt x 372.39125pt>
File: chapters/chapter02/fig02/prediction.png Graphic file (type png)

<use chapters/chapter02/fig02/prediction.png>
Package pdftex.def Info: chapters/chapter02/fig02/prediction.png used on input
line 46.
(pdftex.def) Requested size: 411.82198pt x 254.63622pt.
[6 <./chapters/chapter02/fig02/1overM.png>]) (./chapters/conclusion/conclusion
.tex [7 <./chapters/chapter02/fig02/prediction.png>] [8
[6 <./chapters/chapter02/fig02/1overM.png>] [7 <./chapters/chapter02/fig02/pre
diction.png>])
(./chapters/conclusion/conclusion.tex [8]) (./chapters/appendices/app0A.tex
[9

]) (./chapters/appendices/app0A.tex [9] [10
] [10

]
LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `T1/fnc/m/n' will be
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2112,15 +2085,15 @@ LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `TS1/fnc/m/n' will be
] [16

]
<chapters/appendices/figa/nm1000.jpg, id=210, 147.55125pt x 250.9375pt>
<chapters/appendices/figa/nm1000.jpg, id=252, 147.55125pt x 250.9375pt>
File: chapters/appendices/figa/nm1000.jpg Graphic file (type jpg)

<use chapters/appendices/figa/nm1000.jpg>
Package pdftex.def Info: chapters/appendices/figa/nm1000.jpg used on input line
18.
(pdftex.def) Requested size: 149.73477pt x 254.63622pt.

<chapters/appendices/figa/np1000.jpg, id=211, 303.1325pt x 183.68625pt>
<chapters/appendices/figa/np1000.jpg, id=253, 303.1325pt x 183.68625pt>
File: chapters/appendices/figa/np1000.jpg Graphic file (type jpg)

<use chapters/appendices/figa/np1000.jpg>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2168,9 +2141,6 @@ Package nag Warning: Command \sc is an old LaTeX 2.09 command.

)

Package natbib Warning: There were undefined citations.


Package nag Warning: 2 complaints in total.

[21
Expand All @@ -2187,29 +2157,11 @@ Package nag Warning: 2 complaints in total.

Package atveryend Info: Empty hook `BeforeClearDocument' on input line 405.
Package atveryend Info: Empty hook `AfterLastShipout' on input line 405.
(./project.aux

Package natbib Warning: Citation(s) may have changed.
(natbib) Rerun to get citations correct.

)
(./project.aux)
Package atveryend Info: Executing hook `AtVeryEndDocument' on input line 405.
Package atveryend Info: Executing hook `AtEndAfterFileList' on input line 405.


Package rerunfilecheck Warning: File `project.out' has changed.
(rerunfilecheck) Rerun to get outlines right
(rerunfilecheck) or use package `bookmark'.

Package rerunfilecheck Info: Checksums for `project.out':
(rerunfilecheck) Before: BACFB913A1B8EB027A64F5C46CB4FEF5;443
(rerunfilecheck) After: 3A2E9988A35C7045CE1042CDC1406035;980.

LaTeX Warning: There were undefined references.


LaTeX Warning: Label(s) may have changed. Rerun to get cross-references right.

Package rerunfilecheck Info: File `project.out' has not changed.
(rerunfilecheck) Checksum: 51BF556FE3B7E96580D6E365ACDC4D50;1040.
)
(\end occurred when \ifx on line 31 was incomplete)
(\end occurred when \ifx on line 19 was incomplete)
Expand All @@ -2218,24 +2170,24 @@ LaTeX Warning: Label(s) may have changed. Rerun to get cross-references right.
(\end occurred when \ifx on line 95 was incomplete)
(\end occurred when \ifx on line 59 was incomplete)
Here is how much of TeX's memory you used:
29581 strings out of 493029
547014 string characters out of 6136234
832854 words of memory out of 5000000
32180 multiletter control sequences out of 15000+600000
107277 words of font info for 256 fonts, out of 8000000 for 9000
29597 strings out of 493029
547197 string characters out of 6136234
834664 words of memory out of 5000000
32189 multiletter control sequences out of 15000+600000
107513 words of font info for 260 fonts, out of 8000000 for 9000
1146 hyphenation exceptions out of 8191
52i,13n,80p,1007b,485s stack positions out of 5000i,500n,10000p,200000b,80000s
52i,12n,80p,1007b,483s stack positions out of 5000i,500n,10000p,200000b,80000s
{/usr/share/texlive/texmf-di
st/fonts/enc/dvips/base/8r.enc}</usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/publi
c/fourier/fourier-mex.pfb></usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/fou
rier/fourier-mlit.pfb></usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/fourier
/fourier-ms.pfb></usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/urw/ncntrsbk/uncb8a.
pfb></usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/urw/ncntrsbk/uncr8a.pfb></usr/sh
are/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/urw/ncntrsbk/uncri8a.pfb>
Output written on project.pdf (27 pages, 344343 bytes).
Output written on project.pdf (27 pages, 345500 bytes).
PDF statistics:
283 PDF objects out of 1000 (max. 8388607)
233 compressed objects within 3 object streams
74 named destinations out of 1000 (max. 500000)
42608 words of extra memory for PDF output out of 42996 (max. 10000000)
324 PDF objects out of 1000 (max. 8388607)
274 compressed objects within 3 object streams
75 named destinations out of 1000 (max. 500000)
42688 words of extra memory for PDF output out of 42996 (max. 10000000)

17 changes: 9 additions & 8 deletions NUGN580/Report3_Approach-Critical/project.out
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -7,11 +7,12 @@
\BOOKMARK [0][-]{chapter.2}{Results}{}% 7
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.2.1}{Subcritical multiplication factor}{chapter.2}% 8
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.2.2}{Criticality prediction}{chapter.2}% 9
\BOOKMARK [0][-]{chapter.3}{Conclusion}{}% 10
\BOOKMARK [0][-]{appendix.A}{Neutron population in a subcritical system}{}% 11
\BOOKMARK [0][-]{appendix.B}{Detailed data tables}{}% 12
\BOOKMARK [0][-]{appendix.C}{Power instrumentation}{}% 13
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.C.1}{NM1000}{appendix.C}% 14
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.C.2}{NP/NPP1000}{appendix.C}% 15
\BOOKMARK [0][-]{appendix.D}{Coefficient of determination R2}{}% 16
\BOOKMARK [0][-]{section*.5}{Bibliography}{}% 17
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.2.3}{Uncertainties}{chapter.2}% 10
\BOOKMARK [0][-]{chapter.3}{Conclusion}{}% 11
\BOOKMARK [0][-]{appendix.A}{Neutron population in a subcritical system}{}% 12
\BOOKMARK [0][-]{appendix.B}{Detailed data tables}{}% 13
\BOOKMARK [0][-]{appendix.C}{Power instrumentation}{}% 14
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.C.1}{NM1000}{appendix.C}% 15
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.C.2}{NP/NPP1000}{appendix.C}% 16
\BOOKMARK [0][-]{appendix.D}{Coefficient of determination R2}{}% 17
\BOOKMARK [0][-]{section*.5}{Bibliography}{}% 18
Binary file modified NUGN580/Report3_Approach-Critical/project.pdf
Binary file not shown.
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions NUGN580/Report3_Approach-Critical/project.toc
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
\contentsline {chapter}{\chapternumberline {2}Results}{5}{chapter.2}
\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2.1}Subcritical multiplication factor}{5}{section.2.1}
\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2.2}Criticality prediction}{6}{section.2.2}
\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2.3}Uncertainties}{7}{section.2.3}
\contentsline {chapter}{\chapternumberline {3}Conclusion}{9}{chapter.3}
\contentsline {appendix}{\chapternumberline {A}Neutron population in a subcritical system}{11}{appendix.A}
\contentsline {appendix}{\chapternumberline {B}Detailed data tables}{13}{appendix.B}
Expand Down
11 changes: 11 additions & 0 deletions NUGN580/Report4_Control-Rod-Calibration/biblioproject.bib
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
%% This BibTeX bibliography file was created using BibDesk.
%% http://bibdesk.sourceforge.net/
%% Saved with string encoding Unicode (UTF-8)
@misc{reactor01,
title = {{USGS} Reactor Lab: Control rod calibration},
author = {\vspace{0mm}T. Debey},
howpublished = {Handouts},
note = {Accessed: 2016-09-28}
}
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
%
% file: localoperator.tex
% author: Victor Brena
% description: Briefly describes properties of the local operator.
%

\chapter{Delayed neutrons}
\label{app:app01}

\initial{T}his appendix presents the importance of the delayed neutrons in a nuclear reactor. It presents, without going into detailed mathematics, the impact of their non-existence of a nuclear chain reaction.

\section{Neutron lifetime}

First, let's talk about the neutron lifetime. In a PWR reactor, it is $10^{-5}$ seconds ($10^{-7}$ seconds in a BWR). This means that after this time on average, the neutron will have disappeared (absorbed, absorbed to induce fission, or leaked out of the reactor).

\section{Multiplication factor}
The multiplication factor k leads to the critical, subcritical and supercritical states.
$k < 1$ : Subcritical, the chain reaction dies
$k = 1$ : Critical, the chain reaction is nice, the power is constant
$k > 1$ : Supercritical, the neutron population increases with each generation, the power increases. No good.

\section{A world without delayed neutrons}

If we do not consider the delayed neutrons into the kinetics equation, and a multiplication factor equals to 1.001 (quite close to 1, we all agree) then we have the following evolution of the neutron population with time:

\begin{equation}\label{eq6}
n(t) = N*e^{k-1}*e^{\frac{t}{X}}
\end{equation}

Where X is the mean lifetime of the neutrons inside the reactor. So, in a PWR for example, and considering k = 1.001 (difficult to get closer to criticality in real operations):
\begin{equation}\label{eq7}
n(t) = N*e^{k-1}*e^{\frac{t}{10^{-5}}}
\end{equation}

This gives us :
\begin{equation}\label{eq8}
n(t) = N*e^{100t}
\end{equation}

This means that the neutron population is *not at all* under control. After 1 second, we have the original population (N) multiplied by $e^{100}$ (gigantic number). So the power in the reactor would increase very quickly, even though the multiplication factor is as close as possible to 1.
So, what are we missing ? The \emph{delayed neutrons}.

\section{The real world, with delayed neutrons}
Where do they come from ? To answer that, we must be sure to understand where the neutrons come from in a reactor. Several possibilities :

\begin{enumerate}
\item Fission induced neutrons (mainly uranium-235 gets hits by a low energy neutron, and produce on average around 2 neutrons)

\item External sources

\item Different decay reactions (instead of undergoing fission, an atom, uranium-235 for example, would absorb one neutron and release two neutrons, and some other reactions like that)
\end{enumerate}

So, what are we missing ? Well, the fission of an atom creates two smaller atoms. Those are the ones (called precursors) that will release neutrons later, by decaying. Thus \emph{delayed neutrons}. Indeed, the mean lifetime of a precursor neutron is 13 seconds roughly (compared to the $10^{-5}$ seconds in a PWR).
Delayed neutrons represents around 700 pcm (0.7\%) of the whole neutrons "produced" during a generation. This very small difference is what actually allow us to control the chain reaction in a nuclear reactor.





\
Loading

0 comments on commit 6d61ba8

Please sign in to comment.