Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed the return result of ShardingSuffixs cannot be correctly matched when using string type table suffix. #152

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 18, 2024

Conversation

geekeryy
Copy link

@geekeryy geekeryy commented Mar 18, 2024

…ot be correctly matched when using string type table suffix.

Fixed the problem that the return result of ShardingSuffixs cannot be correctly matched when using string type table suffix.

  • Do only one thing
  • Non breaking API changes
  • Tested

What did this pull request do?

User Case Description

…ot be correctly matched when using string type table suffix.

Fixed the problem that the return result of ShardingSuffixs cannot be correctly matched when using string type table suffix.
@geekeryy
Copy link
Author

@jinzhu Can you help me, thanks?

@huacnlee huacnlee changed the title fix: Fixed the problem that the return result of ShardingSuffixs cann… Fixed the return result of ShardingSuffixs cannot be correctly matched when using string type table suffix. Mar 18, 2024
@huacnlee huacnlee merged commit 1ccc174 into go-gorm:main Mar 18, 2024
8 checks passed
@huacnlee
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you.

GaleHuang pushed a commit to GaleHuang/sharding that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2024
…ot be correctly matched when using string type table suffix. (go-gorm#152)

Fixed the problem that the return result of ShardingSuffixs cannot be correctly matched when using string type table suffix.
@omer9564
Copy link

any plan on releasing this ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants