API examples: move csaf_searcher to a lower prio place #489
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
s-l-teichmann
requested review from
tschmidtb51,
bernhardreiter,
ThomasJunk and
JanHoefelmeyer
ThomasJunk
reviewed
Nov 2, 2023
ThomasJunk
reviewed
Nov 2, 2023
ThomasJunk
previously approved these changes
Nov 2, 2023
s-l-teichmann
dismissed stale reviews from ThomasJunk and JanHoefelmeyer
via
afeec1d
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
csaf_searcher(here renamed topurls_searcher) is not a top level tool of the csaf_distribution.It it just a little API example and should be treated as such.
As the whole API infrastructure is WIP we should not suggest that we give
the same grants to the examples as for the real tools.