Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Set the stack alignment to the size of the underlying vector type for x86 microkernel builds. #7718

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 28, 2025

Conversation

copybara-service[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@copybara-service copybara-service bot commented Jan 24, 2025

Set the stack alignment to the size of the underlying vector type for x86 microkernel builds.

This makes register spilling a lot faster in some cases where the stack pointer was not aligned.

Note that the baseline stack alignment depends on the size and alignment of the underlying call stack and may therefore vary significantly from one type of benchmark to another.

@copybara-service copybara-service bot force-pushed the test_719315622 branch 6 times, most recently from 87c2b30 to 898c95b Compare January 27, 2025 09:22
@copybara-service copybara-service bot changed the title Set the stack alignment to 64 bytes for x86 microkernel builds. Set the stack alignment to the size of the underlying vector type for x86 microkernel builds. Jan 27, 2025
@copybara-service copybara-service bot force-pushed the test_719315622 branch 2 times, most recently from 1d4f7fe to ef7806b Compare January 28, 2025 08:06
… `x86` microkernel builds.

This makes register spilling a _lot_ faster in some cases where the stack pointer was not aligned.

Note that the baseline stack alignment depends on the size and alignment of the underlying call stack and may therefore vary significantly from one type of benchmark to another.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 720461988
@copybara-service copybara-service bot merged commit 41dd468 into master Jan 28, 2025
@copybara-service copybara-service bot deleted the test_719315622 branch January 28, 2025 08:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant