Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add conditional read after write for rules #584

Draft
wants to merge 13 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pracucci
Copy link
Collaborator

In this PR:

Danny Kopping and others added 13 commits October 25, 2023 22:33
NOTE:
Rebased from main after refactor in #13014

Signed-off-by: Danny Kopping <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Danny Kopping <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Danny Kopping <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Danny Kopping <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Danny Kopping <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Danny Kopping <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Marco Pracucci <[email protected]>
for i, rule := range g.rules {
select {
case <-g.done:
return
default:
}

func(i int, rule Rule) {
eval := func(i int, rule Rule, independent, async bool) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

instead of propagating this all the way way down and modifying a couple of interfaces, can't we just move NewOriginContext(ctx, NewRuleDetail(rule, independent)) from the rule to g.Eval (i.e. this function)?

Comment on lines +32 to +33
// Independent holds whether this rule depends on the result of other rules
// within the same rule group or not.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this forgets to mention that if other rules depend on this rule Independent is also true

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
1 out of 2 committers have signed the CLA.

✅ pracucci
❌ Danny Kopping


Danny Kopping seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants