Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(fix) Changed condition for docusaurus terminology loaders registration #36

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Nodthar1107
Copy link

This plugin doesn't work with newest docusaurus version since 3.4.0 because of incorrect loaders registration. Docusaurus doesn't work with docusaurus/plugin-content-doc

Pull request fix it

This plugin doesn't work with newest docusaurus version since 3.4.0 because of incorrect loaders registration. Docusaurus doesn't work with docusaurus/plugin-content-doc
@Battleman
Copy link

This is fantastic, I've been scratching my head on a fix for a few days.
Hopefully maintainers can merge and release it soon.

(just for cross-reference, this is reported in #32 )

@PackElend
Copy link

looks like it is not maintained anymore, no activity by any maintainer

@tsironis
Copy link
Collaborator

@PackElend I will review and merge. Expect a new version mid-January, I'm currently on PTO.

Unfortunately, this is not on the top of our list of priorities, since we are currently migrating away from docusaurus.

@PackElend
Copy link

PackElend commented Dec 30, 2024

at least we know, that there is someone :)

What about #34, which is the active Repo? You know that person?

currently migrating away from docusaurus.

what a shame 😄 , how it comes, where are you going?

@tsironis
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes, we were working at the same team with @thanasis00 back in the day. The current repo is a continuation of the Gitlab repo, but as far as I can recall, we did an almost complete overhaul.

what a shame 😄 , how it comes, where are you going?

We are currently evaluating Rspress, moving away from the webpack architecture which is very slow, especially for our case that involves parsing thousands of files and AST.

@dmairs
Copy link

dmairs commented Jan 10, 2025

Any updates?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants