Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency nl.jqno.equalsverifier:equalsverifier to v3.17.4 #992

Merged

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link

@renovate renovate bot commented Nov 30, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
nl.jqno.equalsverifier:equalsverifier (source) 3.17.3 -> 3.17.4 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

jqno/equalsverifier (nl.jqno.equalsverifier:equalsverifier)

v3.17.4

  • Fixes bug where the wrong generic type was provided when multiple fields of the same type but with different generic parameters exist. (Issue 1022)
Changed
  • The internal instantiation logic has been further refactored, to be more robust and extensible for future enhancements.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

coverage: 89.922% (+0.2%) from 89.729%
when pulling a251cbe on renovate/nl.jqno.equalsverifier-equalsverifier-3.x
into 91a28e6 on master.

@hazendaz hazendaz self-assigned this Dec 2, 2024
@hazendaz hazendaz merged commit 7647d81 into master Dec 2, 2024
31 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/nl.jqno.equalsverifier-equalsverifier-3.x branch December 2, 2024 22:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants