[NL] Finetune cover_HassGetState

[TheFes]

Changes:

• Add support for floors
• Split sentences so you can't say things like: Hoeveel gordijnen in de woonkamer staan in de woonkamer open in de woonkamer
• Only allow the afdekking expansion rule for the named sentences so for a cover named like bloemetjes something like is bloemetjeslamp open won't work
• Include spaces in the optional parts so there are no double spaces when the optional part isn't used

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Improved language processing for Dutch sentences, enhancing the handling of names, areas, and floors.
  • Enhanced semantic recognition for the HassGetState intent, improving the accuracy of cover state, class, and area identification.

• Bug Fixes

  • Fixed formatting issues in placeholder handling, resulting in more consistent and accurate sentence expansions.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes involve updates to the YAML files related to Dutch language processing rules. These modifications enhance the expansion rules for placeholders and improve the recognition patterns for the HassGetState intent. This aims to optimize the parsing and understanding of names, areas, and floors as well as improve the extraction of cover states and classes from user inputs.

Changes

File	Change Summary
sentences/nl/_common.yaml	Updated expansion rules for names, areas, floors, name-area combinations, and sensor name-area patterns.
sentences/nl/cover_HassGetState...	Modified patterns for recognizing cover states, classes, and areas in the HassGetState intent to improve semantic clarity.

---

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1303569 and 90f4809.

Files selected for processing (2)

• sentences/nl/_common.yaml (1 hunks)
• sentences/nl/cover_HassGetState.yaml (1 hunks)

Additional comments not posted (10)

sentences/nl/cover_HassGetState.yaml (5)

29-29: LGTM! But verify the pattern usage.

The changes to include floors and avoid redundancy are approved.

However, ensure that the pattern matches the intended structure and is used correctly in the codebase.

Verification successful

Let's correct the search pattern to avoid regex interpretation issues and re-run the search to verify the pattern usage.

---

Let's correct the search pattern by escaping both the square brackets and curly braces to avoid regex interpretation issues and re-run the search.

---

Pattern usage verified successfully.

The pattern Welk[e] {cover_classes:device_class} <is> {cover_states:state} is correctly used in the codebase.

• sentences/nl/cover_HassGetState.yaml: Line 29

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the modified pattern in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the pattern usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new pattern.
rg --type yaml $'Welk[e] {cover_classes:device_class} <is> {cover_states:state}'

Length of output: 235

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the modified pattern in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the pattern usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new pattern.
rg --type yaml 'Welk\[e\] {cover_classes:device_class} <is> {cover_states:state}'

Length of output: 241

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the modified pattern in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the pattern usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new pattern.
rg --type yaml 'Welk\[e\] \{cover_classes:device_class\} <is> \{cover_states:state\}'

Length of output: 201

---

15-15: LGTM! But verify the pattern usage.

The changes to include floors and avoid redundancy are approved.

However, ensure that the pattern matches the intended structure and is used correctly in the codebase.

Verification successful

---

Pattern usage verified successfully.

The pattern [<in> (<area>|<floor>) |ergens |nog ][een ]{cover_classes:device_class} [<in> <area>] {cover_states:state} [<in> <area>] is used correctly in the codebase.

• File: sentences/nl/cover_HassGetState.yaml
  • Lines: 15-15

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the modified pattern in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the pattern usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new pattern.
rg --type yaml $'([<in> (<area>|<floor>) |ergens |nog ][een ]{cover_classes:device_class} [<in> <area>] {cover_states:state} [<in> <area>]'

Length of output: 389

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the modified pattern in the codebase.

# Corrected Test: Search for the pattern usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new pattern.
rg --type yaml '\[<in> \(<area>\|<floor>\) \|ergens \|nog \]\[een \]{cover_classes:device_class} \[<in> <area>\] {cover_states:state} \[<in> <area>\]'

Length of output: 421

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the modified pattern in the codebase.

# Simplified Test: Search for parts of the pattern to identify the problematic part.
rg --type yaml '\[<in> \(<area>\|<floor>\)'

Length of output: 930

---

22-22: LGTM! But verify the pattern usage.

The changes to include floors and avoid redundancy are approved.

However, ensure that the pattern matches the intended structure and is used correctly in the codebase.

Verification successful

---

Pattern usage verified and correct.

The modified pattern in sentences/nl/cover_HassGetState.yaml is present and used correctly in the codebase.

• sentences/nl/cover_HassGetState.yaml: Line 22

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the modified pattern in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the pattern usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new pattern.
rg --type yaml $'[<in> (<area>|<floor>) ][<alle> |de ]{cover_classes:device_class} {cover_states:state}'

Length of output: 312

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the modified pattern in the codebase by escaping curly braces.

# Test: Search for the pattern usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new pattern.
rg --type yaml '\[<in> (<area>\|<floor>) \]\[<alle> \|de \]\{cover_classes:device_class\} \{cover_states:state\}'

Length of output: 115

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of components of the modified pattern in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the presence of individual components of the pattern.

# Search for <in> (<area>|<floor>)
rg --type yaml '\[<in> (<area>\|<floor>)\]'

# Search for [<alle> |de ]
rg --type yaml '\[<alle> \|de \]'

# Search for {cover_classes:device_class}
rg --type yaml '\{cover_classes:device_class\}'

# Search for {cover_states:state}
rg --type yaml '\{cover_states:state\}'

Length of output: 76056

---

36-36: LGTM! But verify the pattern usage.

The changes to include floors and avoid redundancy are approved.

However, ensure that the pattern matches the intended structure and is used correctly in the codebase.

---

6-6: LGTM! But verify the pattern usage.

The changes to include floors and avoid redundancy are approved.

However, ensure that the pattern matches the intended structure and is used correctly in the codebase.

Verification successful

---

Pattern usage verified.

The modified pattern components have been successfully found in the codebase, confirming the intended structure is used correctly.

• Files containing the pattern:
  • sentences/nl/cover_HassGetState.yaml

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the modified pattern in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the pattern usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new pattern.
rg --type yaml $'([<in> <area>][ ];<name>[[ ]<afdekking>]) {cover_states:state} [<in> (<area>|<floor>)]'

Length of output: 317

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the modified pattern in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the pattern usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new pattern.
rg --type yaml '\(\[<in> <area>\]\[ \];<name>\[\[ \]<afdekking>\]\) {cover_states:state} \[<in> \(<area>\|<floor>\)\]'

Length of output: 357

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the modified pattern in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the pattern usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new pattern.
rg --type yaml '\[<in> <area>\].*<name>.*<afdekking>.*{cover_states:state}.*<in>.*<area>.*<floor>'

Length of output: 303

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the modified pattern in the codebase by searching for key components separately.

# Test: Search for the first key component.
rg --type yaml '\[<in> <area>\]'

# Test: Search for the second key component.
rg --type yaml '<name>.*<afdekking>'

# Test: Search for the third key component.
rg --type yaml '{cover_states:state}'

# Test: Search for the fourth key component.
rg --type yaml '\[<in>.*<area>.*<floor>\]'

Length of output: 36817

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the modified pattern in the codebase by searching for key components separately.

# Test: Search for the third key component with escaped braces.
rg --type yaml '\{cover_states:state\}'

# Test: Search for the fourth key component with a simpler pattern.
rg --type yaml '<in>.*<floor>'

Length of output: 32680

sentences/nl/_common.yaml (5)

378-378: LGTM! But verify the rule usage.

The changes to the name expansion rule are approved.

However, ensure that the rule matches the intended structure and is used correctly in the codebase.

Verification successful

Let's correct the regex parse error by escaping the curly braces in the search pattern and re-run the verification script.

---

The changes to the name expansion rule have been verified successfully.

• The modified rule was found only in the specified file and line, indicating correct usage.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the modified expansion rule in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the rule usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new rule.
rg --type yaml $'name: "[de |het ]{name}"'

Length of output: 168

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the modified expansion rule in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the rule usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new rule.
rg --type yaml 'name: "\[de \|het \]\{name\}"'

Length of output: 101

---

383-383: LGTM! But verify the rule usage.

The changes to the name_area expansion rule are approved.

However, ensure that the rule matches the intended structure and is used correctly in the codebase.

Verification successful

---

Verification Successful!

The name_area expansion rule is used correctly across the codebase and matches the intended structure.

• sentences/nl/_common.yaml
• sentences/nl/lock_HassTurnOn.yaml
• sentences/nl/lock_HassTurnOff.yaml
• sentences/nl/homeassistant_HassTurnOff.yaml
• sentences/nl/homeassistant_HassTurnOn.yaml
• sentences/nl/binary_sensor_HassGetState.yaml

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the modified expansion rule in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the rule usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new rule.
rg --type yaml $'name_area: "([<in> <area>][ ];<name>[ ][<type>])"'

Length of output: 68

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for occurrences of `name_area` in the codebase and inspect the context of the matches.

# Search for occurrences of `name_area` in YAML files.
rg --type yaml 'name_area' -A 3 -B 3

Length of output: 28549

---

379-379: LGTM! But verify the rule usage.

The changes to the area expansion rule are approved.

However, ensure that the rule matches the intended structure and is used correctly in the codebase.

Verification successful

---

The expansion rule usage has been successfully verified.

The modified area expansion rule was found in the expected file and no additional occurrences were detected elsewhere in the codebase.

• Verified in: sentences/nl/_common.yaml

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the modified expansion rule in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the rule usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new rule.
rg --type yaml $'area: "[de |het ]{area}"'

Length of output: 168

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the modified expansion rule in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the rule usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new rule.

# Adjust the regex pattern to avoid the repetition quantifier error.
rg --type yaml 'area: "\[de \|het \]\{area\}"'

Length of output: 101

---

380-380: LGTM! But verify the rule usage.

The changes to the floor expansion rule are approved.

However, ensure that the rule matches the intended structure and is used correctly in the codebase.

Verification successful

---

Verified: The floor expansion rule modification is correctly implemented and consistently used in the codebase.

• The modified rule floor: "[de |het ]{floor}" is correctly present in the sentences/nl/_common.yaml file.
• No inconsistencies or errors were found in the usage of this rule.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the modified expansion rule in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the rule usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new rule.
rg --type yaml $'floor: "[de |het ]{floor}"'

Length of output: 173

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the modified expansion rule in the codebase.

# Corrected Test: Search for the rule usage with the correct regex pattern. Expect: Only occurrences of the new rule.
rg --type yaml 'floor: "\[de \|het \]\{floor\}"'

Length of output: 105

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the `floor` expansion rule throughout the codebase.

# Search for all occurrences of the `floor` expansion rule in the codebase.
rg --type yaml 'floor:'

Length of output: 12686

---

384-384: LGTM! But verify the rule usage.

The changes to the sensor_name_area expansion rule are approved.

However, ensure that the rule matches the intended structure and is used correctly in the codebase.

Verification successful

---

The sensor_name_area rule is correctly defined and widely used.

The sensor_name_area rule is defined in sentences/nl/_common.yaml and used extensively in sentences/nl/binary_sensor_HassGetState.yaml. This confirms its active implementation and correctness.

• sentences/nl/_common.yaml: Line 384
• sentences/nl/binary_sensor_HassGetState.yaml: Multiple occurrences

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the modified expansion rule in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the rule usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new rule.
rg --type yaml $'sensor_name_area: "([[door|met|bij] [de|het|een] {area}][ ]{name}"'

Length of output: 294

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the modified expansion rule in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the rule usage. Expect: Occurrences of the new rule.
rg --type yaml 'sensor_name_area:'

Length of output: 82

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the `sensor_name_area` rule throughout the codebase.

# Test: Search for any usage of the `sensor_name_area` rule. Expect: Occurrences in relevant files.
rg 'sensor_name_area'

Length of output: 8840

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[TheFes]

@frenck another one.
I'll just go to them one by one, and see what can be improved per file.

Thanks :)