Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove check of HTTP_NO_CONTENT as there are no 'No Content' replies in v1 #469

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 5, 2025

Conversation

DCSBL
Copy link
Collaborator

@DCSBL DCSBL commented Jan 5, 2025

Which brings v1/init.py to 100% test coverage 🎉

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved handling of HTTP response status codes in the API request method.
    • Refined error handling for different HTTP status scenarios.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 5, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the _request method in the HomeWizardEnergyV1 class within the homewizard_energy/v1/__init__.py file. The primary change involves removing the specific handling for HTTPStatus.NO_CONTENT. Previously, this status would return a tuple with HTTPStatus.NO_CONTENT and None. Now, the method will process NO_CONTENT responses like other status codes, maintaining the existing error handling logic for FORBIDDEN, NOT_FOUND, and OK statuses.

Changes

File Change Summary
homewizard_energy/v1/__init__.py Removed special handling for HTTPStatus.NO_CONTENT in the _request method

Possibly related PRs


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a0284f1 and 922f639.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • homewizard_energy/v1/__init__.py (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • homewizard_energy/v1/init.py

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 5, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.62%. Comparing base (a0284f1) to head (922f639).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #469      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   99.25%   99.62%   +0.36%     
==========================================
  Files           8        8              
  Lines         539      537       -2     
  Branches       38       37       -1     
==========================================
  Hits          535      535              
+ Misses          3        2       -1     
+ Partials        1        0       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@DCSBL DCSBL merged commit 9767ff9 into main Jan 5, 2025
32 checks passed
@DCSBL DCSBL deleted the DCSBL-2025-11 branch January 5, 2025 14:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant