Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Provide the client certificate without relying on golang matching it #152

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 14, 2024

Conversation

EnriqueL8
Copy link
Contributor

Noticed when providing the client certificates to ffresty, it wasn't getting being passed on the API call itself and it's due to Golang not matching that cert based on the requirements of the request.

Some background https://forum.golangbridge.org/t/issue-with-client-tls-authentication/8214

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 14, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.80%. Comparing base (bc46928) to head (f2d135c).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #152   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.80%   99.80%           
=======================================
  Files          82       82           
  Lines        6646     6672   +26     
=======================================
+ Hits         6633     6659   +26     
  Misses         12       12           
  Partials        1        1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@peterbroadhurst peterbroadhurst left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 - a fun "feature" of the Go TLS implementation

@peterbroadhurst peterbroadhurst merged commit 9da872a into main Oct 14, 2024
5 checks passed
@peterbroadhurst peterbroadhurst deleted the fix_client_mtls branch October 14, 2024 19:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants