Remove SingleUseSandbox #125
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
simongdavies
approved these changes
Jan 21, 2025
|
We should consider renaming MultiUseSandbox after this, although I guess that will be a breaking change (I know this one is but AFAIK no one is using |
Signed-off-by: Ludvig Liljenberg <[email protected]>
ludfjig
force-pushed
the
remove_singlebox
branch
from
873370f to
c0299a3
Compare
danbugs
approved these changes
Jan 22, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Removes the singleusesandbox, as it serves no purpose. This is a first step towards refactoring the evolve, transition-func, etc., abstractions