Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gorm upgrade to 1.25 and tweaks #1

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Oct 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

henryjcee
Copy link

No description provided.

phroggyy and others added 7 commits September 14, 2024 20:58
* Generate unique savepoint names

* Add a test for deeply nested wrapped transactions
* Use official SQL Server docker image for tests

* Try with tag 2019-latest instead of latest

* Use platform ubuntu-20.04 for SQL Server

* Switch to 2019-CU18-ubuntu-20.04

* Check with 2022-latest image tag and ubuntu-latest platform

* Update health-cmd

* Try sqlcmd without -N -C

* Re-include -N -C, try with ubuntu-20.04

* Try ubuntu-20.04 without -N -C (last trial)

* Finalize working config

* Remove unused env variables
…shes (go-gorm#7209)

* feat(workflows): add GitHub Action to create release on new tag

This workflow automates the release creation process whenever a new
tag is pushed to the repository. It checks if a release for the tag
already exists and creates one if it doesn't, enhancing the release
management and streamlining the deployment process.

* test

* fix(workflow): improve release existence check in release-on-tag.yml

Refactor the script to improve checking for existing releases by tag.
Return an object instead of using core.setOutput to streamline the
workflow logic. Also, set result-encoding to string for better
compatibility.

* fix(workflow): correct output handling in release-on-tag.yml

Corrected the output handling in the 'release-on-tag.yml' workflow file
by changing 'result-encoding' to 'outputs'. This ensures that the step
correctly checks if a release exists before attempting to create a new
one, thereby avoiding potential errors during the release process.
Added a blank line for better readability.

* fix(workflow): correct output setting in release-on-tag workflow

Refactored how the release_exists output is set to be compatible with
GitHub Actions syntax. This ensures the workflow reliably detects if
a release already exists, improving the robustness of the release
process.

* fix(release): correct output handling in release-on-tag workflow

Improved the way outputs are managed in the 'check_release' step by
returning values instead of direct assignments. This change ensures
better handling of release existence checks and improves code
readability. Added 'result-encoding' to specify string encoding for
results.

* fix(workflow): correct release existence check and add debug output

Refactored the release existence check to return a simple boolean
string ('true'/'false') rather than an object. Added a step to print
the release existence status for debugging purposes. This ensures
correct conditional evaluation and aids in troubleshooting workflow
issues.

* fix(workflow): simplify release process by removing redundant checks

The release-on-tag workflow has been streamlined by eliminating the
redundant steps checking for existing releases. This change reduces
complexity and speeds up the release process by directly creating a
release on every tag push without prior existence verification.
… broken this for us and at least one other person.
@@ -922,7 +923,7 @@ func (field *Field) setupValuerAndSetter() {
if !reflectV.IsValid() {
field.ReflectValueOf(ctx, value).Set(reflect.New(field.FieldType).Elem())
} else if reflectV.Kind() == reflect.Ptr && reflectV.IsNil() {
return
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will raise a PR on the upstream for this. Once this is resolved I think we can go back to depending on the upstream version.

@henryjcee henryjcee merged commit bf5cd45 into master Oct 10, 2024
2 of 62 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants