Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: challenger as channel admin #65

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 25, 2024
Merged

feat: challenger as channel admin #65

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 25, 2024

Conversation

beer-1
Copy link
Contributor

@beer-1 beer-1 commented Sep 25, 2024

Description

Closes: #XXXX


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Simplified structure of the bridge_config object in the API documentation, replacing the challengers array with a single challenger string property.
  • Chores

    • Updated several dependencies to their latest versions for improved performance and security.

@beer-1 beer-1 self-assigned this Sep 25, 2024
@beer-1 beer-1 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 25, 2024 13:32
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 25, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the bridge_config object in the Swagger YAML file, where the property challengers has been replaced with a single property challenger, changing its type from an array of strings to a string. Additionally, the go.mod file has been updated to reflect new versions of several dependencies, including updates for github.com/initia-labs/OPinit, github.com/initia-labs/initia, and a modification to the replacement directive for github.com/cometbft/cometbft.

Changes

File Change Summary
client/docs/swagger-ui/swagger.yaml Property modified: challengers in bridge_config object → challenger (type changed to string)
go.mod Dependency versions updated for github.com/initia-labs/OPinit, github.com/initia-labs/initia, and indirect dependency for github.com/initia-labs/OPinit/api; replacement for github.com/cometbft/cometbft updated to a new commit version.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant API
    participant Config

    User->>API: Request bridge configuration
    API->>Config: Retrieve bridge_config
    Config-->>API: Return bridge_config with challenger
    API-->>User: Send bridge configuration response
Loading

Poem

🐰 In the meadow, changes bloom,
A challenger now takes the room.
Dependencies dance, versions align,
With each hop, our code will shine!
Let's celebrate with a joyful cheer,
For progress made, we hold so dear! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
client/docs/swagger-ui/swagger.yaml (1)

Line range hint 37479-69803: Summary: Consistent change from multiple challengers to single challenger. Comprehensive review recommended.

The changes in this file consistently modify the bridge_config object across multiple sections, replacing the challengers array with a single challenger string. This simplification of the data model is well-executed in the Swagger documentation.

However, given the significance of this change:

  1. Ensure that all parts of the codebase that previously handled multiple challengers are updated to work with a single challenger.
  2. Review and update any external documentation or interfaces that may reference the old challengers array.
  3. Consider the implications on the business logic and ensure that this change aligns with the intended functionality of the system.

To facilitate a comprehensive review, consider running the following script to identify areas of the codebase that might need attention:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Comprehensive search for challenger-related code and documentation

echo "Searching for challenger-related code:"
rg --type go --type typescript --type javascript --type python 'challenger' -g '!client/docs/swagger-ui/swagger.yaml'

echo "Searching for challenger-related documentation:"
rg --type md --type txt 'challenger' -g '!client/docs/swagger-ui/swagger.yaml'

echo "Searching for potential missed plurals:"
rg --type go --type typescript --type javascript --type python 'challengers' -g '!client/docs/swagger-ui/swagger.yaml'

This will help identify any areas that might have been missed during the initial update and ensure a smooth transition to the new single-challenger model.

go.mod (2)

280-280: LGTM. Document the reason for using a custom fork.

The update to the replacement directive for github.com/cometbft/cometbft points to a newer commit in the custom fork maintained by initia-labs. This provides precise control over the dependency version.

Consider documenting the reason for using this custom fork and the specific changes it includes. This will help with future maintenance and understanding of why the standard version isn't being used.


Line range hint 1-287: Overall changes look good. Consider updating project documentation.

The go.mod file updates appear to be part of a coordinated effort to upgrade dependencies. The changes primarily consist of minor version increments and an update to a custom fork's commit hash. These updates likely include bug fixes and small improvements.

Consider the following recommendations:

  1. Update the project documentation to reflect these dependency changes if necessary.
  2. Ensure that your CI/CD pipeline includes tests that verify compatibility with these updated dependencies.
  3. If you're using a dependency management tool like Dependabot, make sure it's configured to handle custom replacements and forks correctly.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 99b7b5b and 105c7d8.

🔇 Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • client/docs/swagger-ui/swagger.yaml (4 hunks)
  • go.mod (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments not posted (6)
client/docs/swagger-ui/swagger.yaml (4)

68899-68900: LGTM. Consistent change across different sections.

The modification from challengers to challenger is consistently applied here, maintaining the integrity of the API documentation.


69028-69029: LGTM. Continued consistency in changes.

The modification from challengers to challenger is consistently applied in this section as well, further ensuring the uniformity of the API documentation.


69802-69803: LGTM. Consistent change applied to opinit.ophost.v1.BridgeConfig. Review external interfaces.

The modification from challengers to challenger is consistently applied in the opinit.ophost.v1.BridgeConfig object, maintaining the uniformity of the change across different parts of the system.

Given that this change affects the opinit.ophost.v1.BridgeConfig object, please verify if any external interfaces or documentation need to be updated:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for external references to BridgeConfig and multiple challengers

# Test 1: Search for references to BridgeConfig in other files
echo "Searching for references to BridgeConfig:"
rg --type go --type typescript --type javascript --type python 'BridgeConfig' -g '!client/docs/swagger-ui/swagger.yaml'

# Test 2: Search for external documentation mentioning multiple challengers
echo "Searching for external documentation mentioning multiple challengers:"
rg --type md --type txt 'challengers' -g '!client/docs/swagger-ui/swagger.yaml'

Ensure that all external interfaces and documentation are updated to reflect the change from multiple challengers to a single challenger.


37479-37480: LGTM. Verify system-wide impact of changing from multiple challengers to a single challenger.

The change from challengers (array) to challenger (string) simplifies the data model and is more consistent with the proposer property. However, this represents a significant change in how challengers are managed.

Please run the following script to verify the impact of this change across the codebase:

Ensure that all parts of the system that previously dealt with multiple challengers are updated to work with a single challenger.

go.mod (2)

169-169: LGTM. Indirect dependency update is consistent.

The update of the indirect dependency github.com/initia-labs/OPinit/api to v0.5.1 aligns with the direct dependency update of github.com/initia-labs/OPinit. This consistency is good practice for maintaining compatibility across the dependency tree.


28-29: LGTM. Verify compatibility with updated dependencies.

The minor version updates for github.com/initia-labs/OPinit and github.com/initia-labs/initia from v0.5.0 to v0.5.1 are consistent and likely include bug fixes or small improvements.

Please ensure that these updates are compatible with your codebase. Run the following script to check for any breaking changes or deprecation notices in the changelogs:

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.80%. Comparing base (99b7b5b) to head (105c7d8).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #65   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   76.80%   76.80%           
=======================================
  Files          14       14           
  Lines        1410     1410           
=======================================
  Hits         1083     1083           
  Misses        280      280           
  Partials       47       47           

@beer-1 beer-1 merged commit 65a30b9 into main Sep 25, 2024
9 checks passed
@beer-1 beer-1 deleted the feat/ibcperm-admin branch September 25, 2024 14:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant