-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add ADAL01 #116
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add ADAL01 #116
Conversation
Hi @qiliu1013, After your refactor of ADAB in I have commented out the broken parts of the code to create the listing for now, which generates ADAL01 without the four missing columns until this is fixed. |
Hi @edelarua, no need to show "Characterization Results" and "Patient Treatment Emergent NAb Status" in the ADAL01. A the new standard specs, there were move into PARAM now. We don't need to consider them. Did I answer all your questions? Thanks, |
To confirm - "Patient Treatment Emergent ADA Status" also no longer need to be considered, correct? If so then yes you answered all my questions, and the template should be ready for review! Thanks Qi!! |
Sorry. Patient Treatment Emergent ADA Status is PARAMCD = "ADASTAT1". No need to consider "Patient Treatment Emergent NAb Status" |
Hi @edelarua, can you please share the output with me? Thanks! |
hi @qiliu1013 , can you review the output at https://github.com/insightsengineering/tlg-catalog/pull/116/files#diff-800dcce08155543ad547403b286591745b8c15d6d35a7b4fec7dc33a51da067c please |
@qiliu1013 see a screenshot of the TLG-C output here: |
# A tibble: 24 × 9 | ||
USUBJID VISIT ISTPT NFRLT RES_ADA TU_ADA RES_NAB TU_NAB AVAL_pk | ||
<lstng_ky> <lstng_ky> <fct> <dbl> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> | ||
1 AB12345-RUS-16-id-165 Day 2 24H 24 Negative N/A NA N/A 0.00 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@edelarua, do you know why AVAL_PK is 0.00? It should be some numbers or NA. RES_ADA and TU_ADA seems not matched to me. I checked the data, they were matched. Can you please take a look?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@qiliu1013 I believe those AVAL
values were set to 0 in adpc
in random.cdisc.data
. I have added a line in to convert 0 values as well as NA
s to "N/A"
for this column.
blocking this for the moment. It seems we need some refactoring in the rcd data again. |
@shajoezhu and @edelarua, can you please let me know where to find the latest adal01 code? I didn't see it under 37_adal01 branch. Thanks! |
I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA 3 out of 4 committers have signed the CLA. |
I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA |
I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA |
Signed-off-by: Joe Zhu <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
need to update snapshot
hi @edelarua , could you update the snapshot, once insightsengineering/random.cdisc.data#317 is in please. Thanks! |
this is potentially blocked by insightsengineering/random.cdisc.data#319 |
Snapshot has been updated. |
Work from #38 moved here due to repo restructuring since previous PR was created.
Closes #37