-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 205
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Prepare for 0.32.0 release #1964
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems that README.md remains the same as v0.31. I don't know if you did it on purpose for some reason, but just in case I comment.! :)
@hj-johannes-lee good catch. Yes we have updated the README in release branches too so it's good to get that added here too |
thanks @hj-johannes-lee 👍. Those changes are now added. |
Based on torvalds/linux@4fecf94 torvalds/linux@f91f2a9 Signed-off-by: Mikko Ylinen <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
According to: https://dgpu-docs.intel.com/devices/hardware-table.html
NFD rules are missing for following ARC / Alchemist GPU IDs with Xe-HPG architecture:
- 56A2
- 56BA
- 56BC
- 56BD
- 56BB
There are also couple of newer Xe-LPG & Xe2 architecture iGPUs with ARC branding:
- 7D55 (MeteorLake)
- 64A0 (LunarLake)
But I guess iGPUs can be skipped from that list.
However, I think there could be new platform rule for the recent Battlemage series dGPU PCI IDs:
- E20B
- E20C
I'm not disagreeing that they are missing, but are they preventing the use of GPU plugin with those devices? afaik, the answer is no. It's just the additional label related to arc and/or battlemage devices. |
I'm not insisting BMG one, but as long as Arc label is used, it should include correct list of devices. If that label is deprecated, then it would be OK to not keep it up to date. |
Signed-off-by: Tuomas Katila <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tuomas Katila <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tuomas Katila <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks OK to me.
No description provided.