Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create master pod spec from the dlrover-master spec of elasticjob. #1438

Conversation

workingloong
Copy link
Collaborator

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Create master pod spec from the dlrover-master spec of elasticjob spec.

Why are the changes needed?

Fix #1432

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

Yes. Users can define the dlrover-master in the elasticjob.

How was this patch tested?

UT.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 12, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.19%. Comparing base (70bc908) to head (bfdd2f6).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1438   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.19%   81.19%           
=======================================
  Files         238      238           
  Lines       23169    23169           
=======================================
  Hits        18813    18813           
  Misses       4356     4356           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@samplise samplise left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@samplise samplise merged commit f762e17 into intelligent-machine-learning:master Jan 13, 2025
10 checks passed
@workingloong workingloong deleted the support-dlrover-master-spec branch January 13, 2025 11:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support user defined resource quota.
2 participants