This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 7, 2024. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 72
Cache JsonProvider.provider() result as per javadoc recommendation #78
Open
gbloisi
wants to merge
1
commit into
javaee:master
Choose a base branch
from
gbloisi:master
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Currently this would actually decrease performance with default implementation if JsonProvider is cached by client application (as it is supposed to). See
jsonp/impl/src/main/java/org/glassfish/json/JsonProviderImpl.java
Line 69 in 1341356
When JsonProvider instance is cached like this buffer pool exists only once. Because it uses ConcurrentLinkedQueue it will decrease performance in multithreaded environment because of synchronization.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I certainly see dangers making it
final
. That way for the lifetime of the Json class in a particular JVM it would remain the same even if the underlying provider may change (less likely without OSGi but possible for some implementations)Keeping a
static
cache, maybe, as long as there's at least a protected or similar way to reset it, see how we did in JSR 363 withServiceProvider
or CDI.I am not convinced we still need this in Java EE 8, maybe leave to a future (Jakarta EE) version of JSON-P?