Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Add datasets
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
jreduardo committed Mar 16, 2019
1 parent 0415669 commit 88fbdc0
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 11 changed files with 591 additions and 0 deletions.
177 changes: 177 additions & 0 deletions R/datasets.R
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,177 @@
#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
#' @title Artificial defoliation in cotton phenology
#'
#' @description Cotton production can be drastically reduced by attack
#' of defoliating insects. Depending on the growth stage, the plants
#' can recover from the caused damage and keep production not affected
#' or can have the production reduced by low intensity defoliation. In
#' order to study the recovery of cotton plants (\emph{Gossypium
#' hirsutum}) in terms of production, Silva (2012) conducted a
#' greenhouse experiment under a completely randomized design with
#' five replicates. The experimental unity was a pot with two plants
#' and it was recorded the number of cotton bolls at five artificial
#' defoliation levels (0\%, 25\%, 50\%, 75\%, and 100\%) and five
#' growth stages: vegetative, flower-bud, blossom, fig and cotton
#' boll.
#'
#' @format A \code{\link[tibble]{tibble}} with 125 observations and 4
#' colums:
#'
#' \itemize{
#' \item \code{stage}: A factor with the (phenological) growth stages;
#' \item \code{defol}: Numerical with the defoliation levels (percent in
#' leaf area removed with scissors);
#' \item \code{rept}: Indexes of repetition;
#' \item \code{bolls}: Number of bolls produced at harvest of cotton.
#'
#' }
#'
#' @usage data(cotton, package = "cmpreg")
#' @references Silva, A. M., Degrande, P. E., Suekane, R., Fernandes,
#' M. G., Zeviani, W. M. (2012). Impacto de diferentes niveis de
#' desfolha artificial nos estagios fenologicos do
#' algodoeiro. \strong{Revista de Ciencias Agrarias}, 35(1), 163–172.
#'
"cotton"

#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
#' @title Soil moisture and potassium doses on soybean culture
#'
#' @description A study of potassium doses and soil moisture levels on
#' soybean (\emph{Glicine Max}) production. The tropical soils are
#' usually poor in potassium (K) and demand potassium fertilization
#' when cultivated with soybean to obtain satisfactory yields. Soybean
#' production is affected by long exposition to water deficit. As
#' potassium is a nutrient involved in the water balance in plant, by
#' hyphotesis, a good supply of potassium avoids to reduce
#' production. To evaluate the effects of potassium doses and soil
#' humidity levels on soybean production, Serafim (2012) conducted a
#' \eqn{5\times 3} factorial experiment in a randomized complete
#' block design with 5 replicates. Five different potassium doses (0,
#' 30, 60, 120 and 180 \eqn{\times} mg dm\eqn{^{-3}}) were applied to
#' the soil and soil moisture levels were controlled at (37.5, 50, and
#' 62.5\%). The experiment was carried out in a greenhouse and the
#' experimental units were pots with two plants in each.
#'
#' @format A \code{\link[tibble]{tibble}} with 74 observations and 6
#' colums:
#'
#' \itemize{
#'
#' \item \code{K}: Integer value indicated the potassium fertilization
#' dose (in mg dm\eqn{^{-3}});
#' \item \code{water}: Numerical value of amount of water in the soil
#' (soil moisture in percent);
#' \item \code{block}: Fatcor indicating block;
#' \item \code{seeds}: Number of bean seeds at pot;
#' \item \code{vpods}: Number of viable pods at pot;
#' \item \code{tpods}: Total of pods at pot.
#'
#' }
#'
#' @usage data(soybean, package = "cmpreg")
#' @references Serafim, M. E., F. B. Ono, W. M. Zeviani, J. O. Novelino,
#' and J. V. Silva (2012). Umidade do solo e doses de potassio na
#' cultura da soja. \strong{Revista Ciencia Agronomica}, 43(2),
#' 222-227.
#'
"soybean"

#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
#' @title Toxicity of nitrofen in aquatic systems
#'
#' @description Nitrofen is no longer in commercial use in the United
#' States, having been the first pesticide to be withdrawn due to
#' tetragenic effects (Bailer, 1994). This data set comes from an
#' experiment to measure the reproductive toxicity of the herbicide,
#' nitrofen, on a species of zooplankton (\emph{Ceriodaphnia
#' dubia}). Fifty animals were randomized into batches of ten and each
#' batch was put in a solution with a measured concentration of
#' nitrofen (0, .8, 1.6, 2.35 and 3.10
#' \eqn{\mu}g/100litre. Subsequently, the number of live offspring was
#' recorded.
#'
#' @format A \code{\link[tibble]{tibble}} with 50 observations and 2
#' colums:
#'
#' \itemize{
#'
#' \item \code{dose}: Numeric value of the nitrofen concentration level
#' (in \eqn{\mu}g/ 100 litre);
#' \item \code{noffs}: Number of live offspring.
#'
#' }
#'
#' @usage data(nitrofen, package = "cmpreg")
#' @references Bailer, A. and J. Oris (1994). Assessing toxicity of
#' pollutant in aquatic systems. \strong{In Case Studies in Biometry},
#' 25-40.
#'
"nitrofen"

#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
#' @title Annona mucosa for control of Sitophilus zeamaus
#'
#' @description New control methods are necessary for stored grain pest
#' management programs due to both the widespread problems of
#' insecticide-resistance populations and the increasing concerns of
#' consumers regarding pesticide residues in food products. Ribeiro
#' (2013) carried out an experiment to assess the bioactivity of
#' extracts of \emph{Annona mucosa} (Annonaceae) for control
#' \emph{Sitophilus zeamaus} (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), a major pest
#' of stored maize in Brazil. Petri dishes containing 10g of corn were
#' treated with extracts prepared with different parts of \emph{Annona
#' mucosa} (seeds, leaves and branches) or just water (control) were
#' completely randomized with 10 replicates. Then 20 animals adults
#' were placed in each Petri dish and the numbers of emerged insects
#' (progeny) after 60 days were recorded.
#'
#' @format A \code{\link[tibble]{tibble}} with 40 observations and 2
#' colums:
#'
#' \itemize{
#'
#' \item \code{extract}: Factor indicating the extrated used in the
#' solution;
#' \item \code{ninsect}: Number of emerged insects.
#'
#' }
#'
#' @usage data(sitophilus, package = "cmpreg")
#' @references Ribeiro, L. P., J. D. Vendramim, K. U. Bicalho,
#' M. S. Andrade, J. B. Fernandes, R. A. Moral, and C. G. B. Demetrio
#' (2013). Annona mucosa Jacq. (Annonaceae): A promising source of
#' bioactive compounds against Sitophilus zeamais Mots. (Coleoptera:
#' Curculionidae). \strong{Journal of Stored Products Research}, 55,
#' 6-14.
#'
"sitophilus"

#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
#' @title Alternative substrats for bromeliad production
#'
#' @description This dataset comes from a randomized experiment
#' conducted in a greenhouse in four blocks design with objective of
#' evaluate five different recipients of alternative substrates for
#' bromeliads (Kanashiro, 2008). All treatments contained peat and
#' perlite and differed in the third component: Pinus bark, Eucalyptus
#' bark, Coxim, coconut fiber and Xaxim. The response variable was the
#' number of leaves per experimental unit (pot with initially eight
#' plants), which was registered at 4, 173, 229, 285, 341, and 435
#' days after planting.
#'
#' @format A \code{\link[tibble]{tibble}} with 120 observations and 4
#' colums:
#'
#' \itemize{
#'
#' \item \code{treat}: Factor indicating the alternative substrates;
#' \item \code{time}: Days after planting;
#' \item \code{block}: Factor indicating block;
#' \item \code{nleaves}: The median number of leaves.
#'
#' }
#'
#' @usage data(bromelia, package = "cmpreg")
#'
"bromelia"
121 changes: 121 additions & 0 deletions data-raw/bromelia.txt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
treat time block nleaves
Pinus bark 4 I 6
Pinus bark 4 II 6
Pinus bark 4 III 6
Pinus bark 4 IV 7
Eucalyptus bark 4 I 7
Eucalyptus bark 4 II 6
Eucalyptus bark 4 III 6
Eucalyptus bark 4 IV 7
Coxim 4 I 6
Coxim 4 II 6
Coxim 4 III 6
Coxim 4 IV 7
Coconut fiber 4 I 6
Coconut fiber 4 II 6
Coconut fiber 4 III 6
Coconut fiber 4 IV 7
Xaxim 4 I 7
Xaxim 4 II 6
Xaxim 4 III 7
Xaxim 4 IV 7
Pinus bark 173 I 9
Pinus bark 173 II 9
Pinus bark 173 III 9
Pinus bark 173 IV 9
Eucalyptus bark 173 I 8
Eucalyptus bark 173 II 7
Eucalyptus bark 173 III 7
Eucalyptus bark 173 IV 7
Coxim 173 I 8
Coxim 173 II 8
Coxim 173 III 8
Coxim 173 IV 8
Coconut fiber 173 I 8
Coconut fiber 173 II 8
Coconut fiber 173 III 8
Coconut fiber 173 IV 9
Xaxim 173 I 10
Xaxim 173 II 10
Xaxim 173 III 9
Xaxim 173 IV 9
Pinus bark 229 I 11
Pinus bark 229 II 12
Pinus bark 229 III 11
Pinus bark 229 IV 12
Eucalyptus bark 229 I 11
Eucalyptus bark 229 II 10
Eucalyptus bark 229 III 10
Eucalyptus bark 229 IV 11
Coxim 229 I 11
Coxim 229 II 11
Coxim 229 III 10
Coxim 229 IV 12
Coconut fiber 229 I 10
Coconut fiber 229 II 10
Coconut fiber 229 III 10
Coconut fiber 229 IV 11
Xaxim 229 I 13
Xaxim 229 II 13
Xaxim 229 III 12
Xaxim 229 IV 12
Pinus bark 285 I 14
Pinus bark 285 II 14
Pinus bark 285 III 13
Pinus bark 285 IV 15
Eucalyptus bark 285 I 12
Eucalyptus bark 285 II 13
Eucalyptus bark 285 III 12
Eucalyptus bark 285 IV 13
Coxim 285 I 13
Coxim 285 II 13
Coxim 285 III 13
Coxim 285 IV 14
Coconut fiber 285 I 13
Coconut fiber 285 II 13
Coconut fiber 285 III 12
Coconut fiber 285 IV 13
Xaxim 285 I 14
Xaxim 285 II 14
Xaxim 285 III 14
Xaxim 285 IV 14
Pinus bark 341 I 16
Pinus bark 341 II 17
Pinus bark 341 III 16
Pinus bark 341 IV 17
Eucalyptus bark 341 I 15
Eucalyptus bark 341 II 14
Eucalyptus bark 341 III 14
Eucalyptus bark 341 IV 15
Coxim 341 I 14
Coxim 341 II 15
Coxim 341 III 15
Coxim 341 IV 16
Coconut fiber 341 I 14
Coconut fiber 341 II 16
Coconut fiber 341 III 14
Coconut fiber 341 IV 15
Xaxim 341 I 15
Xaxim 341 II 17
Xaxim 341 III 15
Xaxim 341 IV 16
Pinus bark 435 I 18
Pinus bark 435 II 18
Pinus bark 435 III 16
Pinus bark 435 IV 18
Eucalyptus bark 435 I 15
Eucalyptus bark 435 II 15
Eucalyptus bark 435 III 15
Eucalyptus bark 435 IV 16
Coxim 435 I 15
Coxim 435 II 16
Coxim 435 III 16
Coxim 435 IV 17
Coconut fiber 435 I 16
Coconut fiber 435 II 16
Coconut fiber 435 III 15
Coconut fiber 435 IV 16
Xaxim 435 I 16
Xaxim 435 II 17
Xaxim 435 III 16
Xaxim 435 IV 17
Loading

0 comments on commit 88fbdc0

Please sign in to comment.