-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
Showing
11 changed files
with
591 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,177 @@ | ||
#----------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
#' @title Artificial defoliation in cotton phenology | ||
#' | ||
#' @description Cotton production can be drastically reduced by attack | ||
#' of defoliating insects. Depending on the growth stage, the plants | ||
#' can recover from the caused damage and keep production not affected | ||
#' or can have the production reduced by low intensity defoliation. In | ||
#' order to study the recovery of cotton plants (\emph{Gossypium | ||
#' hirsutum}) in terms of production, Silva (2012) conducted a | ||
#' greenhouse experiment under a completely randomized design with | ||
#' five replicates. The experimental unity was a pot with two plants | ||
#' and it was recorded the number of cotton bolls at five artificial | ||
#' defoliation levels (0\%, 25\%, 50\%, 75\%, and 100\%) and five | ||
#' growth stages: vegetative, flower-bud, blossom, fig and cotton | ||
#' boll. | ||
#' | ||
#' @format A \code{\link[tibble]{tibble}} with 125 observations and 4 | ||
#' colums: | ||
#' | ||
#' \itemize{ | ||
#' \item \code{stage}: A factor with the (phenological) growth stages; | ||
#' \item \code{defol}: Numerical with the defoliation levels (percent in | ||
#' leaf area removed with scissors); | ||
#' \item \code{rept}: Indexes of repetition; | ||
#' \item \code{bolls}: Number of bolls produced at harvest of cotton. | ||
#' | ||
#' } | ||
#' | ||
#' @usage data(cotton, package = "cmpreg") | ||
#' @references Silva, A. M., Degrande, P. E., Suekane, R., Fernandes, | ||
#' M. G., Zeviani, W. M. (2012). Impacto de diferentes niveis de | ||
#' desfolha artificial nos estagios fenologicos do | ||
#' algodoeiro. \strong{Revista de Ciencias Agrarias}, 35(1), 163–172. | ||
#' | ||
"cotton" | ||
|
||
#----------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
#' @title Soil moisture and potassium doses on soybean culture | ||
#' | ||
#' @description A study of potassium doses and soil moisture levels on | ||
#' soybean (\emph{Glicine Max}) production. The tropical soils are | ||
#' usually poor in potassium (K) and demand potassium fertilization | ||
#' when cultivated with soybean to obtain satisfactory yields. Soybean | ||
#' production is affected by long exposition to water deficit. As | ||
#' potassium is a nutrient involved in the water balance in plant, by | ||
#' hyphotesis, a good supply of potassium avoids to reduce | ||
#' production. To evaluate the effects of potassium doses and soil | ||
#' humidity levels on soybean production, Serafim (2012) conducted a | ||
#' \eqn{5\times 3} factorial experiment in a randomized complete | ||
#' block design with 5 replicates. Five different potassium doses (0, | ||
#' 30, 60, 120 and 180 \eqn{\times} mg dm\eqn{^{-3}}) were applied to | ||
#' the soil and soil moisture levels were controlled at (37.5, 50, and | ||
#' 62.5\%). The experiment was carried out in a greenhouse and the | ||
#' experimental units were pots with two plants in each. | ||
#' | ||
#' @format A \code{\link[tibble]{tibble}} with 74 observations and 6 | ||
#' colums: | ||
#' | ||
#' \itemize{ | ||
#' | ||
#' \item \code{K}: Integer value indicated the potassium fertilization | ||
#' dose (in mg dm\eqn{^{-3}}); | ||
#' \item \code{water}: Numerical value of amount of water in the soil | ||
#' (soil moisture in percent); | ||
#' \item \code{block}: Fatcor indicating block; | ||
#' \item \code{seeds}: Number of bean seeds at pot; | ||
#' \item \code{vpods}: Number of viable pods at pot; | ||
#' \item \code{tpods}: Total of pods at pot. | ||
#' | ||
#' } | ||
#' | ||
#' @usage data(soybean, package = "cmpreg") | ||
#' @references Serafim, M. E., F. B. Ono, W. M. Zeviani, J. O. Novelino, | ||
#' and J. V. Silva (2012). Umidade do solo e doses de potassio na | ||
#' cultura da soja. \strong{Revista Ciencia Agronomica}, 43(2), | ||
#' 222-227. | ||
#' | ||
"soybean" | ||
|
||
#----------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
#' @title Toxicity of nitrofen in aquatic systems | ||
#' | ||
#' @description Nitrofen is no longer in commercial use in the United | ||
#' States, having been the first pesticide to be withdrawn due to | ||
#' tetragenic effects (Bailer, 1994). This data set comes from an | ||
#' experiment to measure the reproductive toxicity of the herbicide, | ||
#' nitrofen, on a species of zooplankton (\emph{Ceriodaphnia | ||
#' dubia}). Fifty animals were randomized into batches of ten and each | ||
#' batch was put in a solution with a measured concentration of | ||
#' nitrofen (0, .8, 1.6, 2.35 and 3.10 | ||
#' \eqn{\mu}g/100litre. Subsequently, the number of live offspring was | ||
#' recorded. | ||
#' | ||
#' @format A \code{\link[tibble]{tibble}} with 50 observations and 2 | ||
#' colums: | ||
#' | ||
#' \itemize{ | ||
#' | ||
#' \item \code{dose}: Numeric value of the nitrofen concentration level | ||
#' (in \eqn{\mu}g/ 100 litre); | ||
#' \item \code{noffs}: Number of live offspring. | ||
#' | ||
#' } | ||
#' | ||
#' @usage data(nitrofen, package = "cmpreg") | ||
#' @references Bailer, A. and J. Oris (1994). Assessing toxicity of | ||
#' pollutant in aquatic systems. \strong{In Case Studies in Biometry}, | ||
#' 25-40. | ||
#' | ||
"nitrofen" | ||
|
||
#----------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
#' @title Annona mucosa for control of Sitophilus zeamaus | ||
#' | ||
#' @description New control methods are necessary for stored grain pest | ||
#' management programs due to both the widespread problems of | ||
#' insecticide-resistance populations and the increasing concerns of | ||
#' consumers regarding pesticide residues in food products. Ribeiro | ||
#' (2013) carried out an experiment to assess the bioactivity of | ||
#' extracts of \emph{Annona mucosa} (Annonaceae) for control | ||
#' \emph{Sitophilus zeamaus} (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), a major pest | ||
#' of stored maize in Brazil. Petri dishes containing 10g of corn were | ||
#' treated with extracts prepared with different parts of \emph{Annona | ||
#' mucosa} (seeds, leaves and branches) or just water (control) were | ||
#' completely randomized with 10 replicates. Then 20 animals adults | ||
#' were placed in each Petri dish and the numbers of emerged insects | ||
#' (progeny) after 60 days were recorded. | ||
#' | ||
#' @format A \code{\link[tibble]{tibble}} with 40 observations and 2 | ||
#' colums: | ||
#' | ||
#' \itemize{ | ||
#' | ||
#' \item \code{extract}: Factor indicating the extrated used in the | ||
#' solution; | ||
#' \item \code{ninsect}: Number of emerged insects. | ||
#' | ||
#' } | ||
#' | ||
#' @usage data(sitophilus, package = "cmpreg") | ||
#' @references Ribeiro, L. P., J. D. Vendramim, K. U. Bicalho, | ||
#' M. S. Andrade, J. B. Fernandes, R. A. Moral, and C. G. B. Demetrio | ||
#' (2013). Annona mucosa Jacq. (Annonaceae): A promising source of | ||
#' bioactive compounds against Sitophilus zeamais Mots. (Coleoptera: | ||
#' Curculionidae). \strong{Journal of Stored Products Research}, 55, | ||
#' 6-14. | ||
#' | ||
"sitophilus" | ||
|
||
#----------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
#' @title Alternative substrats for bromeliad production | ||
#' | ||
#' @description This dataset comes from a randomized experiment | ||
#' conducted in a greenhouse in four blocks design with objective of | ||
#' evaluate five different recipients of alternative substrates for | ||
#' bromeliads (Kanashiro, 2008). All treatments contained peat and | ||
#' perlite and differed in the third component: Pinus bark, Eucalyptus | ||
#' bark, Coxim, coconut fiber and Xaxim. The response variable was the | ||
#' number of leaves per experimental unit (pot with initially eight | ||
#' plants), which was registered at 4, 173, 229, 285, 341, and 435 | ||
#' days after planting. | ||
#' | ||
#' @format A \code{\link[tibble]{tibble}} with 120 observations and 4 | ||
#' colums: | ||
#' | ||
#' \itemize{ | ||
#' | ||
#' \item \code{treat}: Factor indicating the alternative substrates; | ||
#' \item \code{time}: Days after planting; | ||
#' \item \code{block}: Factor indicating block; | ||
#' \item \code{nleaves}: The median number of leaves. | ||
#' | ||
#' } | ||
#' | ||
#' @usage data(bromelia, package = "cmpreg") | ||
#' | ||
"bromelia" |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ | ||
treat time block nleaves | ||
Pinus bark 4 I 6 | ||
Pinus bark 4 II 6 | ||
Pinus bark 4 III 6 | ||
Pinus bark 4 IV 7 | ||
Eucalyptus bark 4 I 7 | ||
Eucalyptus bark 4 II 6 | ||
Eucalyptus bark 4 III 6 | ||
Eucalyptus bark 4 IV 7 | ||
Coxim 4 I 6 | ||
Coxim 4 II 6 | ||
Coxim 4 III 6 | ||
Coxim 4 IV 7 | ||
Coconut fiber 4 I 6 | ||
Coconut fiber 4 II 6 | ||
Coconut fiber 4 III 6 | ||
Coconut fiber 4 IV 7 | ||
Xaxim 4 I 7 | ||
Xaxim 4 II 6 | ||
Xaxim 4 III 7 | ||
Xaxim 4 IV 7 | ||
Pinus bark 173 I 9 | ||
Pinus bark 173 II 9 | ||
Pinus bark 173 III 9 | ||
Pinus bark 173 IV 9 | ||
Eucalyptus bark 173 I 8 | ||
Eucalyptus bark 173 II 7 | ||
Eucalyptus bark 173 III 7 | ||
Eucalyptus bark 173 IV 7 | ||
Coxim 173 I 8 | ||
Coxim 173 II 8 | ||
Coxim 173 III 8 | ||
Coxim 173 IV 8 | ||
Coconut fiber 173 I 8 | ||
Coconut fiber 173 II 8 | ||
Coconut fiber 173 III 8 | ||
Coconut fiber 173 IV 9 | ||
Xaxim 173 I 10 | ||
Xaxim 173 II 10 | ||
Xaxim 173 III 9 | ||
Xaxim 173 IV 9 | ||
Pinus bark 229 I 11 | ||
Pinus bark 229 II 12 | ||
Pinus bark 229 III 11 | ||
Pinus bark 229 IV 12 | ||
Eucalyptus bark 229 I 11 | ||
Eucalyptus bark 229 II 10 | ||
Eucalyptus bark 229 III 10 | ||
Eucalyptus bark 229 IV 11 | ||
Coxim 229 I 11 | ||
Coxim 229 II 11 | ||
Coxim 229 III 10 | ||
Coxim 229 IV 12 | ||
Coconut fiber 229 I 10 | ||
Coconut fiber 229 II 10 | ||
Coconut fiber 229 III 10 | ||
Coconut fiber 229 IV 11 | ||
Xaxim 229 I 13 | ||
Xaxim 229 II 13 | ||
Xaxim 229 III 12 | ||
Xaxim 229 IV 12 | ||
Pinus bark 285 I 14 | ||
Pinus bark 285 II 14 | ||
Pinus bark 285 III 13 | ||
Pinus bark 285 IV 15 | ||
Eucalyptus bark 285 I 12 | ||
Eucalyptus bark 285 II 13 | ||
Eucalyptus bark 285 III 12 | ||
Eucalyptus bark 285 IV 13 | ||
Coxim 285 I 13 | ||
Coxim 285 II 13 | ||
Coxim 285 III 13 | ||
Coxim 285 IV 14 | ||
Coconut fiber 285 I 13 | ||
Coconut fiber 285 II 13 | ||
Coconut fiber 285 III 12 | ||
Coconut fiber 285 IV 13 | ||
Xaxim 285 I 14 | ||
Xaxim 285 II 14 | ||
Xaxim 285 III 14 | ||
Xaxim 285 IV 14 | ||
Pinus bark 341 I 16 | ||
Pinus bark 341 II 17 | ||
Pinus bark 341 III 16 | ||
Pinus bark 341 IV 17 | ||
Eucalyptus bark 341 I 15 | ||
Eucalyptus bark 341 II 14 | ||
Eucalyptus bark 341 III 14 | ||
Eucalyptus bark 341 IV 15 | ||
Coxim 341 I 14 | ||
Coxim 341 II 15 | ||
Coxim 341 III 15 | ||
Coxim 341 IV 16 | ||
Coconut fiber 341 I 14 | ||
Coconut fiber 341 II 16 | ||
Coconut fiber 341 III 14 | ||
Coconut fiber 341 IV 15 | ||
Xaxim 341 I 15 | ||
Xaxim 341 II 17 | ||
Xaxim 341 III 15 | ||
Xaxim 341 IV 16 | ||
Pinus bark 435 I 18 | ||
Pinus bark 435 II 18 | ||
Pinus bark 435 III 16 | ||
Pinus bark 435 IV 18 | ||
Eucalyptus bark 435 I 15 | ||
Eucalyptus bark 435 II 15 | ||
Eucalyptus bark 435 III 15 | ||
Eucalyptus bark 435 IV 16 | ||
Coxim 435 I 15 | ||
Coxim 435 II 16 | ||
Coxim 435 III 16 | ||
Coxim 435 IV 17 | ||
Coconut fiber 435 I 16 | ||
Coconut fiber 435 II 16 | ||
Coconut fiber 435 III 15 | ||
Coconut fiber 435 IV 16 | ||
Xaxim 435 I 16 | ||
Xaxim 435 II 17 | ||
Xaxim 435 III 16 | ||
Xaxim 435 IV 17 |
Oops, something went wrong.