Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

perf: translate #4706

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 3, 2025
Merged

perf: translate #4706

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 3, 2025

Conversation

fit2bot
Copy link
Contributor

@fit2bot fit2bot commented Mar 3, 2025

perf: translate

@fit2bot fit2bot requested a review from a team March 3, 2025 02:51
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ export default {
},
series: [
{
name: this.$t('TaskDistribution'),
name: this.$t('TaskSummary'),
type: 'pie',
top: '10%',
radius: ['45%', '60%'],
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have reviewed the provided code changes for consistency and completeness but found no major issues or inconsistencies. They appear to follow best practices with clear variable names, consistent formatting, and functionality alignment.

In terms of optimizations, I would recommend considering ways you can improve readability and performance without altering existing components' logic. For instance, if pie chart is frequently updated using setInterval calls, rethinking about scheduling update frequency could enhance efficiency; otherwise it's already optimized for current requirements.

However, due to the knowledge cutoff being from September 2021, providing actual implementation guidelines might require more context-specific information beyond what was originally presented in my initial response.

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
</div>

<div class="total-section">
<div class="total-title">Total accounts</div>
<div class="total-title">{{ $t('TotalAccounts') }}</div>
<div class="total-account"> {{ config.total }} </div>
<div class="week-add">
<div class="week-add-title"> {{ $t('WeekAdd') }} </div>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are no major inconsistencies, irregularities, or issues found between the two code blocks provided. It is advisable to review these changes according to their intended purpose. If you need specific advice on optimizations after reviewing their functions, please let me know!

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Mar 3, 2025

@feng626 feng626 merged commit dadfc9a into pam Mar 3, 2025
5 of 6 checks passed
@feng626 feng626 deleted the pr@pam@translate branch March 3, 2025 02:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants