-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 308
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a traitlet to disable recording HTTP request metrics #1472
Merged
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Expanding the signature here makes me a little more cautious to merge. This technically expands a public API which would normally be saved for a major release. However, we rarely make a major release of Jupyter Server (because it requires a lot of work to coordinate with out subprojects).
On the other hand, this change seems small enough that it likely shouldn't trigger a major release. We could also argue that this API is likely unused by anyone outside Jupyter Server, since it's really specific to Jupyter Server. The only people this might affect are folks that monkeypatch this method, which is discouraged.
I think we can proceed as long as we communicate clearly that there's a "possible breaking change" when this is released.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fwiw, that's why I made it a default arg and set it to the value that would cause no behavior change when omitted! So a
log_request(handler)
from any other project would see no difference than before.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Totally, and this is great!
The specific case I was thinking about was where someone patches
log_request
to intercept our logger. Something like this:A Jupyter Server using this monkeypatch would fail after releasing this PR right?
This is definitely a discouraged thing to do 😅, but because this function is public, the reason this fails feels like a breach of contract.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ah interesting. that would fail, but I always assume that if you monkeypatch and something fails, that's on you :D the risk and reward of monkeypatching...
But regardless, I agree this one is ok here. If people do want to override log_request, IMO the way to do that is to override the tornado setting
log_function
instead - and people doing that will not be affected by this change.Is there anything you'd like me to do to make this possible?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed 👍
Nope, I think this is good to go.
I'm mostly raised/noted here in the thread so we can cross-link if someone reports a "bug" after release. It's not a bug, but a consequence of a monkeypatch 😃 Documenting this here is enough for future reference.
Thanks @yuvipanda!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yay, ty @Zsailer!