Skip to content

Updated disel-cli, some changes in generated code. #142

Updated disel-cli, some changes in generated code.

Updated disel-cli, some changes in generated code. #142

Triggered via push July 31, 2024 11:20
Status Failure
Total duration 1m 32s
Artifacts

ci.yml

on: push
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

1 error and 13 warnings
Rustfmt
Process completed with exit code 1.
Rustfmt
The following actions use a deprecated Node.js version and will be forced to run on node20: actions/checkout@v3. For more info: https://github.blog/changelog/2024-03-07-github-actions-all-actions-will-run-on-node20-instead-of-node16-by-default/
clippy
The following actions use a deprecated Node.js version and will be forced to run on node20: actions/checkout@v3. For more info: https://github.blog/changelog/2024-03-07-github-actions-all-actions-will-run-on-node20-instead-of-node16-by-default/
clippy: src/server/splitlist.rs#L147
use of deprecated method `chrono::NaiveDateTime::timestamp`: use `.and_utc().timestamp()` instead
clippy: src/models.rs#L287
fields `id`, `photo_id`, and `tag_id` are never read
clippy: src/models.rs#L332
fields `photo_id` and `person_id` are never read
clippy: src/models.rs#L357
fields `photo_id` and `place_id` are never read
clippy: src/server/search.rs#L248
for loop over a `&Option`. This is more readably written as an `if let` statement
Test Suite
The following actions use a deprecated Node.js version and will be forced to run on node20: actions/checkout@v3. For more info: https://github.blog/changelog/2024-03-07-github-actions-all-actions-will-run-on-node20-instead-of-node16-by-default/
Test Suite: src/server/splitlist.rs#L147
use of deprecated method `chrono::NaiveDateTime::timestamp`: use `.and_utc().timestamp()` instead
Test Suite: src/models.rs#L287
fields `id`, `photo_id`, and `tag_id` are never read
Test Suite: src/models.rs#L332
fields `photo_id` and `person_id` are never read
Test Suite: src/models.rs#L357
fields `photo_id` and `place_id` are never read
Test Suite: src/server/search.rs#L248
for loop over a `&Option`. This is more readably written as an `if let` statement