Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test(revolut_test): added initiate_liquidity_retrieval tests #96

Merged

Conversation

leohscl
Copy link
Contributor

@leohscl leohscl commented Sep 26, 2024

implements initiate_liquidity_retrival tests #84

 [CONTRACTS] implement initiate_liquidity_retrival tests keep-starknet-strange#84
Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 26, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
zkramp-client ❌ Failed (Inspect) Sep 27, 2024 10:07pm
zkramp-website ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Sep 27, 2024 10:07pm

Copy link
Contributor

@0xChqrles 0xChqrles left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The PR is truly qualified as concise ! 🏴‍☠️ 😹 😹

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 66.14%. Comparing base (74c8e3b) to head (dfd05fb).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #96   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   66.14%   66.14%           
=======================================
  Files          11       11           
  Lines         127      127           
=======================================
  Hits           84       84           
  Misses         43       43           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@0xChqrles 0xChqrles merged commit 1399e18 into keep-starknet-strange:main Sep 27, 2024
10 of 11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants