Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Косторной Дмитрий #31

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension


Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
14 changes: 11 additions & 3 deletions Testing/Basic/Basic.csproj
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,19 +1,27 @@
<Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk">

<PropertyGroup>
<TargetFramework>net8.0</TargetFramework>
<TargetFramework>net7.0</TargetFramework>
<ImplicitUsings>enable</ImplicitUsings>
<Nullable>enable</Nullable>
</PropertyGroup>

<PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Release|AnyCPU'">
<LangVersion>preview</LangVersion>
</PropertyGroup>

<PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Debug|AnyCPU'">
<LangVersion>preview</LangVersion>
</PropertyGroup>

<ItemGroup>
<PackageReference Include="coverlet.collector" Version="6.0.2">
<PrivateAssets>all</PrivateAssets>
<IncludeAssets>runtime; build; native; contentfiles; analyzers; buildtransitive</IncludeAssets>
</PackageReference>
<PackageReference Include="FluentAssertions" Version="6.12.0" />
<PackageReference Include="FluentAssertions" Version="6.12.1" />
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk" Version="17.10.0" />
<PackageReference Include="NUnit" Version="4.1.0" />
<PackageReference Include="NUnit" Version="4.2.2" />
<PackageReference Include="NUnit3TestAdapter" Version="4.5.0" />
<PackageReference Include="xunit" Version="2.8.1" />
<PackageReference Include="xunit.runner.visualstudio" Version="2.8.1">
Expand Down
26 changes: 14 additions & 12 deletions Testing/Basic/Homework/1. ObjectComparison/ObjectComparison.cs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
using NUnit.Framework;
using FluentAssertions;
using NUnit.Framework;
using NUnit.Framework.Legacy;

namespace HomeExercise.Tasks.ObjectComparison;
Expand All @@ -14,16 +15,9 @@ public void CheckCurrentTsar()
var expectedTsar = new Person("Ivan IV The Terrible", 54, 170, 70,
new Person("Vasili III of Russia", 28, 170, 60, null));

// Перепишите код на использование Fluent Assertions.
ClassicAssert.AreEqual(actualTsar.Name, expectedTsar.Name);
ClassicAssert.AreEqual(actualTsar.Age, expectedTsar.Age);
ClassicAssert.AreEqual(actualTsar.Height, expectedTsar.Height);
ClassicAssert.AreEqual(actualTsar.Weight, expectedTsar.Weight);

ClassicAssert.AreEqual(expectedTsar.Parent!.Name, actualTsar.Parent!.Name);
ClassicAssert.AreEqual(expectedTsar.Parent.Age, actualTsar.Parent.Age);
ClassicAssert.AreEqual(expectedTsar.Parent.Height, actualTsar.Parent.Height);
ClassicAssert.AreEqual(expectedTsar.Parent.Parent, actualTsar.Parent.Parent);
actualTsar.Should().BeEquivalentTo(expectedTsar, properties => properties
.Excluding(person => person.Id)
.Excluding(person => person.Parent.Id));
}

[Test]
Expand All @@ -34,7 +28,15 @@ public void CheckCurrentTsar_WithCustomEquality()
var expectedTsar = new Person("Ivan IV The Terrible", 54, 170, 70,
new Person("Vasili III of Russia", 28, 170, 60, null));

// Какие недостатки у такого подхода?
/* Данное решение имеет следующие недостатки:
При добавлении новых свойств в класс Person придётся вручную обновлять метод AreEqual и
включать новое свойство в сравнение, что сделает код очень громоздким и замедлит разработку.
В целом, используя собственный метод AreEqual, мы уменьшаем читаемость (особенно если подобных тестов и методов станет много,
а разбираться в этом будет сторонний разработчик), а также
отказываемся от более информативной обработки исключений FluentAssertions (можем увидеть, какое конкретное поле не совпало,
а не просто получим возврат false)
Таким образом моё решение является более устойчивым к изменениям, читабельным и поддерживаемым по сравнению с данным.
*/
ClassicAssert.True(AreEqual(actualTsar, expectedTsar));
}

Expand Down
108 changes: 88 additions & 20 deletions Testing/Basic/Homework/2. NumberValidator/NumberValidatorTests.cs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,31 +1,99 @@

using FluentAssertions;
using NUnit.Framework;
using NUnit.Framework.Legacy;
using System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations;

This comment was marked as resolved.


namespace HomeExercise.Tasks.NumberValidator;

[TestFixture]
public class NumberValidatorTests
{
[Test]
public void Test()
{
Assert.Throws<ArgumentException>(() => new NumberValidator(-1, 2, true));
Assert.DoesNotThrow(() => new NumberValidator(1, 0, true));
Assert.Throws<ArgumentException>(() => new NumberValidator(-1, 2, false));
Assert.DoesNotThrow(() => new NumberValidator(1, 0, true));

ClassicAssert.IsTrue(new NumberValidator(17, 2, true).IsValidNumber("0.0"));
ClassicAssert.IsTrue(new NumberValidator(17, 2, true).IsValidNumber("0"));
ClassicAssert.IsTrue(new NumberValidator(17, 2, true).IsValidNumber("0.0"));
ClassicAssert.IsFalse(new NumberValidator(3, 2, true).IsValidNumber("00.00"));
ClassicAssert.IsFalse(new NumberValidator(3, 2, true).IsValidNumber("-0.00"));
ClassicAssert.IsTrue(new NumberValidator(17, 2, true).IsValidNumber("0.0"));
ClassicAssert.IsFalse(new NumberValidator(3, 2, true).IsValidNumber("+0.00"));
ClassicAssert.IsTrue(new NumberValidator(4, 2, true).IsValidNumber("+1.23"));
ClassicAssert.IsFalse(new NumberValidator(3, 2, true).IsValidNumber("+1.23"));
ClassicAssert.IsFalse(new NumberValidator(17, 2, true).IsValidNumber("0.000"));
ClassicAssert.IsFalse(new NumberValidator(3, 2, true).IsValidNumber("-1.23"));
ClassicAssert.IsFalse(new NumberValidator(3, 2, true).IsValidNumber("a.sd"));
public void WhenPrecisionIsNegative_ShouldReturnArgumentException()

This comment was marked as resolved.

{
Action action = () => new NumberValidator(-1, 2, true);

This comment was marked as resolved.

This comment was marked as resolved.

action.Should().Throw<ArgumentException>().WithMessage("precision must be a positive number");
}

[Test]
public void WhenScaleIsNegative_ShouldThrowArgumentException()
{
Action act = () => new NumberValidator(1, -1, false);
act.Should().Throw<ArgumentException>().WithMessage("precision must be a non-negative number less or equal than precision");

This comment was marked as resolved.

}

[Test]
public void WhenScaleIsMoreThanPrecision_ShouldThrowArgumentException()
{
Action act = () => new NumberValidator(2, 3, false);

This comment was marked as resolved.

act.Should().Throw<ArgumentException>().WithMessage("precision must be a non-negative number less or equal than precision");

This comment was marked as resolved.

}

[Test]
public void WhenValid_ShouldNotThrow()
{
Action act = () => new NumberValidator(1, 0, true);
act.Should().NotThrow();
}

[Test]
public void WhenInputIsEmpty_ShouldReturnFalse()
{
NumberValidator validator = new NumberValidator(5, 2, true);
ValidateNumber(validator, "", false);

This comment was marked as resolved.

}

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Лишняя пустая строка?

[Test]
public void WhenInputIsNull_ShouldReturnFalse()

This comment was marked as resolved.

{
NumberValidator validator = new NumberValidator(5, 2, true);
ValidateNumber(validator, null, false);
}


[Test]

This comment was marked as resolved.

[TestCase("12345", true)]
[TestCase("123.45", true)]
[TestCase("-123.45", false)]
[TestCase("001.23", true)]
[TestCase("0", true)]
[TestCase("0.0", true)]
[TestCase("+123.45", false)]
[TestCase("123456", false)]
[TestCase("123.456", false)]
[TestCase("0000.00", false)]
[TestCase("0.000", false)]
[TestCase("ab.c", false)]
[TestCase("123.45.67", false)]
[TestCase("123,67", true)]
[TestCase("123 45", false)]
[TestCase("++1", false)]
[TestCase("1.", false)]
public void WhenInputIsVarious_ShouldReturnExpected_PositiveValidator(string input, bool expected)

This comment was marked as resolved.

{
NumberValidator validator = new NumberValidator(5, 2, true);
ValidateNumber(validator, input, expected);
}

[Test]
[TestCase("12345", true)]
[TestCase("123.45", true)]
[TestCase("123.45a", false)]
[TestCase("12.3.4", false)]
[TestCase("-0", true)]
[TestCase("-12.45", true)]
[TestCase("-123.45", false)]
[TestCase("--1", false)]
[TestCase("-1.", false)]
public void WhenInputIsVarious_ShouldReturnExpected_NegativeValidator(string input, bool expected)
{
NumberValidator validator = new NumberValidator(5, 2, false);
ValidateNumber(validator, input, expected);
}

private void ValidateNumber(NumberValidator validator, string input, bool expected)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Точно нужен отдельны метод, если он не периспользуется нигде кроме WhenInputIsVarious_ShouldReturnExpected?

{
bool result = validator.IsValidNumber(input);

This comment was marked as resolved.

result.Should().Be(expected, $"Input '{input}' did not return expected result '{expected}'.");
}
}