Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove --kube-root deprecated kind argument #181

Closed

Conversation

stmcginnis
Copy link

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

The --kube-root flag has been deprecated in kind for some time and will be removed. The current equivalent functionality is to pass the path to the kubernetes source as the first non-flag argument to build node-image.

This updates the prow script to use the newer preferred method in preparation for kind dropping the flag.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Related: kubernetes-sigs/kind#3717

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

The --kube-root flag has been deprecated in kind for some time and will
be removed. The current equivalent functionality is to pass the path to
the kubernetes source as the first non-flag argument to "build
node-image".

This updates the prow script to use the newer preferred method in
preparation for kind dropping the flag.

Signed-off-by: Sean McGinnis <[email protected]>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Aug 20, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @stmcginnis!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-csi/csi-lib-utils 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-csi/csi-lib-utils has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @stmcginnis. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-csi member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 20, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@TerryHowe TerryHowe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@TerryHowe: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators

In response to this:

/lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: stmcginnis, TerryHowe
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign xing-yang for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@stmcginnis
Copy link
Author

/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@stmcginnis: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@stmcginnis stmcginnis deleted the deprecated-kind-kube-root branch December 9, 2024 19:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants