-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 669
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ClientConnection] e2e: build a descheduler image and run the descheduler as a pod #1524
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Hi @fanhaouu. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
6237c98
to
770975d
Compare
/ok-to-test |
) | ||
|
||
func TestClientConnectionConfiguration(t *testing.T) { | ||
ctx := context.Background() | ||
clientConnection := componentbaseconfig.ClientConnectionConfiguration{ | ||
testName := "test-clientconnection" | ||
clientSet, err := client.CreateClient(componentbaseconfig.ClientConnectionConfiguration{ | ||
Kubeconfig: os.Getenv("KUBECONFIG"), | ||
QPS: 50, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The descheduler does not allow to configure QPS/Burst client configuration through its flags/configuration. So rewriting this test to deploy a descheduler pod does not test the actual scenario here. I wonder how to refactor this test so we don't need to invoke RunDeschedulerStrategies
.
migrate e2e-clientconnection