Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ClientConnection] e2e: build a descheduler image and run the descheduler as a pod #1524

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

fanhaouu
Copy link
Contributor

migrate e2e-clientconnection

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Sep 23, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @fanhaouu. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 23, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign seanmalloy for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@fanhaouu fanhaouu changed the title e2e: ClientConnection: run the descheduler as a pod [ClientConnection] e2e: build a descheduler image and run the descheduler as a pod Sep 23, 2024
@a7i
Copy link
Contributor

a7i commented Sep 27, 2024

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Sep 27, 2024
)

func TestClientConnectionConfiguration(t *testing.T) {
ctx := context.Background()
clientConnection := componentbaseconfig.ClientConnectionConfiguration{
testName := "test-clientconnection"
clientSet, err := client.CreateClient(componentbaseconfig.ClientConnectionConfiguration{
Kubeconfig: os.Getenv("KUBECONFIG"),
QPS: 50,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The descheduler does not allow to configure QPS/Burst client configuration through its flags/configuration. So rewriting this test to deploy a descheduler pod does not test the actual scenario here. I wonder how to refactor this test so we don't need to invoke RunDeschedulerStrategies.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants