Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Cleanup and fixes #45

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 17, 2024
Merged

chore: Cleanup and fixes #45

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 17, 2024

Conversation

xoscar
Copy link
Contributor

@xoscar xoscar commented Sep 13, 2024

This PR adds a bunch of cleanup changes to make it easier to test, including upgrading the OTEL dependencies

Changes

  • Updates the otel dependencies
  • Upgrades the tracetest dependencies
  • Adds scripts to test k6 and all types
  • Updates scripts to match latest tracetest npm pacakges
  • Adds tail_sampling to the otel collector

Fixes

Checklist

  • tested locally
  • added new dependencies
  • updated the docs
  • added a test

@xoscar xoscar self-assigned this Sep 13, 2024
@@ -11,11 +11,24 @@ receivers:
processors:
batch:

tail_sampling:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't we use the filter approach instead?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the trace state policy is fine but maybe @mathnogueira has a different opinion

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the filter preprocessor is faster and doesn't require as much memory as this one. I mean, it's ok to use this here, but the filter would be better.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just changed it to use filter instead, seems to be working correctly!

jaeger:
endpoint: ${JAEGER_ENDPOINT}
otlp:
endpoint: jaeger:4317
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we want to hardcode this?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah its all dockerized

@xoscar xoscar merged commit b2b68c0 into master Sep 17, 2024
1 check passed
@xoscar xoscar deleted the chore-cleanup-and-fixes branch September 17, 2024 17:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants