Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add offload plugin volume populator #1147

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mnecas
Copy link
Member

@mnecas mnecas commented Oct 29, 2024

WIP

Issues:
[1] Allow migration of "unknow" guests
Right now when we want to migrate an unknown and unsupported operating
system which is unsupported by the virt-v2v [3].

[2] Unifying the process and potential speedup
Right now we are using two different methods for the disk transfer. This
brings additional engineering for maintaining two paths. It's harder to
debug two different flows.
The virt-v2v transfers the disks in the sequence whereas using the CDI we
can start multiple disk imports in parallel. This can improve the
migration speeds.

Fix:
MTV is already using the CNV CDI for the warm and remote migration. We
just need to adjust the code to remove the virt-v2v transfer and rely on
the CNV CDI to do it for us.

Drawbacks:
- CNV CDI *requires* the VDDK, which was till now highly recommended.
- CNV CDI is not maintained inside the MTV and there might be problems
  escalating and backporting the patches as CNV has a different release
  cycle.
- Because we will be migrating all disks in parallel we need to
  optimise our migration scheduler as we don't want to take too much
  of the hosts/network resources. I have already done some
  optimisations in [4,5,6].

Notes:
This change removes the usage of virt-v2v and we will only use the
virt-v2v-in-place.

Ref:
[1] https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MTV-1536
[2] https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MTV-1581
[3] https://access.redhat.com/articles/1351473
[4] kubev2v#1088
[5] kubev2v#1087
[6] kubev2v#1086

Signed-off-by: Martin Necas <[email protected]>
@mnecas mnecas requested a review from yaacov as a code owner October 29, 2024 14:20
@mnecas mnecas marked this pull request as draft October 29, 2024 14:20
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Oct 29, 2024

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant