Add support for RP2350 #16
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…eshly on each build
- Updated docker, github action, and cmake to follow latest PrawnBlaster changes - Updated readme to detail the differences between the two supported boards - Bumped the version to v1.3.0 - Added the `brd` command to respond with the board version - Add some preparation for supporting overclocking - Removed `clocks_init()` call which isn't in the PrawnBlaster and doesn't seem to exist in the same form in the latest SDK. It's unclear to me whether removing this is a problem, but in theory, the replacement is meant to have been called before `main()` runs anyway.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Warning
This has not been tested. It needs to be tested on both a RP2040 board (to verify the SDK upgrade has not broken anything) and a RP2350 board (to verify that the increased RAM is available and functioning)
When built for the Pico 2, we now support:
Other changes:
brdcommand to respond with the board versionclocks_init()call which isn't in the PrawnBlaster and doesn't seem to exist in the same form in the latest SDK. It's unclear to me whether removing this is a problem, but in theory, the replacement is meant to have been called beforemain()runs anyway.