Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: decompose complex function into smaller ones for readability #5517

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 17, 2025

Conversation

italojohnny
Copy link
Member

During the review of another PR, I faced significant challenges understanding where the issue was occurring due to the complexity of a particular function. To address this, I refactored the code by breaking down the large and complex function into smaller, more focused functions. This change not only facilitated the resolution of the problem but also improved the readability and maintainability of the code.

I hope these changes prove helpful to others working with this code in the future. Feedback is welcome

@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:L This PR changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 2, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the refactor Maintenance tasks and housekeeping label Jan 2, 2025
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jan 2, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #5517 will degrade performances by 94.06%

Comparing refactor/build_results (e6fbed1) with main (656f9f3)

Summary

⚡ 1 improvements
❌ 1 regressions
✅ 13 untouched benchmarks

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

Benchmark main refactor/build_results Change
test_successful_run_with_input_type_any 340.8 ms 175.6 ms +94.13%
test_successful_run_with_input_type_text 249.3 ms 4,196.7 ms -94.06%

@italojohnny italojohnny force-pushed the refactor/build_results branch from 1fceaf4 to 3cc0ae3 Compare January 2, 2025 17:29
@github-actions github-actions bot added refactor Maintenance tasks and housekeeping and removed refactor Maintenance tasks and housekeeping labels Jan 2, 2025
codeflash-ai bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2025
…(`refactor/build_results`)

Here is the optimized version of your Python program. I have removed redundant imports, simplified methods, and improved the handling of dictionaries for faster access and mutation.


The updated code is more efficient by.
1. Removing unused imports.
2. Optimizing the `validate_data` method.
3. Simplifying the `__add__` method.
4. Reducing the complexity of `_process_kwargs`.
5. Avoiding duplicate code.
This should provide a boost to both runtime efficiency and memory usage.
@italojohnny italojohnny closed this Jan 2, 2025
@italojohnny italojohnny reopened this Jan 3, 2025
codeflash-ai bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2025
…5517 (`refactor/build_results`)

Here is the optimized version of your Python program. Redundant initializations and repetitive code blocks have been minimized, and appropriate data structures have been used to improve performance.



The overall structure of the program remains unchanged, ensuring the integrity of the return values, while redundant code has been polished for efficiency.
codeflash-ai bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2025
…efactor/build_results`)

To optimize the runtime and memory requirements of the given Python program, several improvements can be implemented, including using more efficient data structures, removing unnecessary operations, and reducing redundancy. Here is the optimized version of your code.



In this optimized version, I have removed redundant operations, used efficient list and dictionary comprehensions, and streamlined some of the methods for better performance. The core functionality remains the same.
Copy link
Contributor

@ogabrielluiz ogabrielluiz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just this one observation. Otherwise LGTM

@github-actions github-actions bot added refactor Maintenance tasks and housekeeping and removed refactor Maintenance tasks and housekeeping labels Jan 6, 2025
@italojohnny italojohnny force-pushed the refactor/build_results branch from 82019a2 to b4d3d92 Compare January 13, 2025 12:57
@github-actions github-actions bot added refactor Maintenance tasks and housekeeping and removed refactor Maintenance tasks and housekeeping labels Jan 13, 2025
@dosubot dosubot bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Jan 13, 2025
@ogabrielluiz ogabrielluiz force-pushed the refactor/build_results branch from b4d3d92 to 2dd8a01 Compare January 13, 2025 15:03
@github-actions github-actions bot added refactor Maintenance tasks and housekeeping and removed refactor Maintenance tasks and housekeeping labels Jan 13, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added refactor Maintenance tasks and housekeeping and removed refactor Maintenance tasks and housekeeping labels Jan 17, 2025
@ogabrielluiz ogabrielluiz added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 17, 2025
auto-merge was automatically disabled January 17, 2025 19:59

Pull Request is not mergeable

Merged via the queue into main with commit 59f375b Jan 17, 2025
25 checks passed
@ogabrielluiz ogabrielluiz deleted the refactor/build_results branch January 17, 2025 20:05
jhpiedrahitao pushed a commit to jhpiedrahitao/langflow that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2025
langflow-ai#5517)

* refactor: decompose complex function into smaller ones for readability

* chore: optimize output processing logic for efficiency

* Update src/backend/base/langflow/custom/custom_component/component.py

Co-authored-by: Gabriel Luiz Freitas Almeida <[email protected]>

---------

Co-authored-by: Gabriel Luiz Freitas Almeida <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer refactor Maintenance tasks and housekeeping size:L This PR changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants