Alternative definition for CMRA #11
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I already saw that this change is coming, but my intention is to wait until it is merged upstream before changing iris-lean. (There may be other practical reasons that the patch cannot be merged or for it to be delayed.) But feel free to make a patch so that it is easy to upgrade on our end, if you want. |
|
Makes sense, thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Making this PR to request a comment (cc @digama0).
A recent paper by Gratzner, Møller and Birkedal proposes a simplified definition for CMRAs, which removes the need for the
coreoperator. They have fully ported Iris with these changes, so it would be realistic for iris-lean to use their definition as well. See in particular section 6.2 of the linked paper.Which definition of
CMRAshould the project use moving forward?