Induction naming convention #522
Open
+21
−0
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
add convention for naming inductive/recursive principles.
apparently 9 months ago, the year changed
eric-wieser
reviewed
Sep 13, 2024
eric-wieser
reviewed
Sep 14, 2024
eric-wieser
reviewed
Sep 14, 2024
eric-wieser
reviewed
Sep 14, 2024
for real this time
a vote was held on zulip to make `motive` the name for the motive argument for both inductive and recursive principles
eric-wieser
reviewed
Sep 25, 2024
Co-authored-by: Eric Wieser <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds a naming convention for induction/recursion principles.
see also the zulip topic