-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 959
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(swarm): improve PeerAddresses
configurability
#5574
Open
stormshield-frb
wants to merge
12
commits into
libp2p:master
Choose a base branch
from
stormshield-frb:feat/identify-make-peer-cache-configurable
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e5435fc
feat(swarm): improve `PeerAddresses` configurability
stormshield-frb 3baf1ec
trigger GitHub actions
stormshield-frb f610b78
Merge branch 'master' into feat/identify-make-peer-cache-configurable
stormshield-frb 7ddd854
deprecate with_cache_size instead of removing it
stormshield-frb 4d17c21
slight changes to changelog messages
stormshield-frb 457c063
don't make PeerAddressesConfig attributes public
stormshield-frb 6521a7f
fix semver checks
stormshield-frb bad6c29
Uniformed rust doc
stormshield-frb 187f010
ensure caching can be disabled
stormshield-frb ad15d3f
Merge branch 'master' into feat/identify-make-peer-cache-configurable
dariusc93 b4754f9
Merge branch 'master' into feat/identify-make-peer-cache-configurable
stormshield-frb 38a9c5c
Merge branch 'master' into feat/identify-make-peer-cache-configurable
dariusc93 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ name = "libp2p-identify" | |
edition = "2021" | ||
rust-version = { workspace = true } | ||
description = "Nodes identification protocol for libp2p" | ||
version = "0.45.0" | ||
version = "0.46.0" | ||
authors = ["Parity Technologies <[email protected]>"] | ||
license = "MIT" | ||
repository = "https://github.com/libp2p/rust-libp2p" | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ name = "libp2p-swarm" | |
edition = "2021" | ||
rust-version = { workspace = true } | ||
description = "The libp2p swarm" | ||
version = "0.45.1" | ||
version = "0.45.2" | ||
authors = ["Parity Technologies <[email protected]>"] | ||
license = "MIT" | ||
repository = "https://github.com/libp2p/rust-libp2p" | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should probably keep
with_cache_size
, deprecating it forwith_cache_config
and just have use that internally so we could probably introduce this as a patch update. Thoughts?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
CC @jxs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If this is possible, I'm definitely doing that. I did not think of that thanks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's done. I'll let you resolve this if you're ok with it. 😉
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok. It was slightly more complicated than expected because since every attributes of
identify::Config
are public, I cannot removecache_size
if we want to stay in0.45.1
and not upgrade to0.46.0
.Just a thought, but I checked the other "
Config
" object across the project and some do expose the attributes but most of them don't. Maybe we should homogenize that and make every attributes private to not have this kind of problem later on ? It would be a pain to make many new major updates but it would once and for all. If you think there is something here, I will happily open an issue to discuss this mater more.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@dariusc93 I'm closing this conversation. Feel free to re-open it if you have other suggestions about it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with François on this one, can we just introduce a breaking change, and take the minor release cycle to also do #5660?