Replacing tabs with spaces

Possibly fixing the MIPs Portal by replacing tabs with spaces

MIP0/MIP0c11-Subproposals/MIP0c11-SP1.md

@@ -26,21 +26,21 @@ MIP0c11-SP1 onboards Charles St.Louis as MIP Editor.
     - Lastly, I would like to note that the expectation is that the MIPs Framework will start out with a MIP Editor from the Maker Foundation (myself) and that other MIP Editors will join later.
 
 - **Credentials**
-	- **Work Experience**
-		- **Current:** 
-			- **Decentralized Governance Architect @ Maker Foundation**
-				- Responsible for the initiative to further research, architect, and formalize Maker Governance processes on behalf of the Maker Foundation ([Self-Sustaining Maker](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/the-maker-foundation-s-vision-of-a-self-sustaining-makerdao-initiation-of-maker-improvement-proposals-mips-framework/1882)).
-				- Other relevant **public** work: 
-					- [docs.makerdao.com](http://docs.makerdao.com/)
-					- Contributor [blog.makerdao.com](https://blog.makerdao.com/)
-					- Contributor [MCD Whitepaper](https://makerdao.com/en/whitepaper) 
-					- Contributor [Developer Guides](https://github.com/makerdao/developerguides) 
-					- [security.makerdao.com](http://security.makerdoa.com/)
-			- **PM @ Ethereum Cat Herders** (Volunteer / Community Contributor) 
-				- This includes helping out with technical audit coordination, advisor/editor of Ethereum.org, developer growth initiatives, creating PM processes and retroactive reports, and relaying information between Ethereum Core Dev teams.
-		- **Past:** 
-		    - Independent technical consultant and advisor
-			- Developer Experience Lead @ Polymath Network
+    - **Work Experience**
+        - **Current:** 
+            - **Decentralized Governance Architect @ Maker Foundation**
+                - Responsible for the initiative to further research, architect, and formalize Maker Governance processes on behalf of the Maker Foundation ([Self-Sustaining Maker](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/the-maker-foundation-s-vision-of-a-self-sustaining-makerdao-initiation-of-maker-improvement-proposals-mips-framework/1882)).
+                - Other relevant **public** work: 
+                    - [docs.makerdao.com](http://docs.makerdao.com/)
+                    - Contributor [blog.makerdao.com](https://blog.makerdao.com/)
+                    - Contributor [MCD Whitepaper](https://makerdao.com/en/whitepaper) 
+                    - Contributor [Developer Guides](https://github.com/makerdao/developerguides) 
+                    - [security.makerdao.com](http://security.makerdoa.com/)
+            - **PM @ Ethereum Cat Herders** (Volunteer / Community Contributor) 
+                - This includes helping out with technical audit coordination, advisor/editor of Ethereum.org, developer growth initiatives, creating PM processes and retroactive reports, and relaying information between Ethereum Core Dev teams.
+        - **Past:** 
+            - Independent technical consultant and advisor
+            - Developer Experience Lead @ Polymath Network
 
 
 - **Relevant Information**

MIP0/MIP0c11-Subproposals/MIP0c11-SP2.md

@@ -38,18 +38,18 @@ To mitigate slightly the whole 'this job is horrible' thing above: that's a rath
 ### Credentials
 - Long(ish) standing member of the MakerDAO community.
 - Started several initiatives with the aim to improve the long-term prospects of MakerDAO.
-	- [Producing a Collateral Onboarding Document](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/governance-initiative-collateral-on-boarding-process/1344)
-	- [Bringing SourceCred to Maker for a trial](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/governance-initiative-experimenting-with-sourcecred/1345)
-	- [Governance at a Glance](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/governance-at-a-glance/84)
-	- [Maintaining Forums](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/forum-navigation-index/648)
-	- [Governance Documentation](https://community-development.makerdao.com/governance/common-topics)
-	- [Collateral Status Index](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/collateral-status-index/2231)
-	- [Signal Requests](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/meta-governance-signal-requests/55)
+    - [Producing a Collateral Onboarding Document](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/governance-initiative-collateral-on-boarding-process/1344)
+    - [Bringing SourceCred to Maker for a trial](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/governance-initiative-experimenting-with-sourcecred/1345)
+    - [Governance at a Glance](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/governance-at-a-glance/84)
+    - [Maintaining Forums](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/forum-navigation-index/648)
+    - [Governance Documentation](https://community-development.makerdao.com/governance/common-topics)
+    - [Collateral Status Index](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/collateral-status-index/2231)
+    - [Signal Requests](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/meta-governance-signal-requests/55)
 
 - Worked on several initiatives meant to improve the long-term prospects of MakerDAO.
-	- [Project Managing Mkrgov.science](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/governance-initiative-maker-governance-analytics-dashboard/1346)
-	- [Cleaning up Executive Audit documentation](https://community-development.makerdao.com/governance/executive-audit)
-	- [The MIPs Framework](https://github.com/LongForWisdom/mips)
+    - [Project Managing Mkrgov.science](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/governance-initiative-maker-governance-analytics-dashboard/1346)
+    - [Cleaning up Executive Audit documentation](https://community-development.makerdao.com/governance/executive-audit)
+    - [The MIPs Framework](https://github.com/LongForWisdom/mips)
 
 - This thread produced by current governance facilitator Rich Brown: https://forum.makerdao.com/t/its-time-for-a-second-governance-facilitator/1998
 

MIP10/MIP10c12-Subproposal-Template.md

@@ -21,21 +21,21 @@ Date Ratified: <yyyy-mm-dd>
 
 ### Oracle Access Fee Model Strategy
 - How does the proposed model work?
-	- Is it based on a strategy to grow the customer base?
-	- Is it based on a strategy to reign in costs to a more sustainable business model?
-	- Is it based on a loss-leader strategy to strengthen the brand of the Maker Protocol?
-	- How are prices applied across different Oracles and different customers?
-	- Is it a flat-fee applied uniformly across every Oracle and customer?
-	- Is it applied to how much value a customer derives from the Oracle?
-	- Is it dependent on how many Oracles a customer is whitelisted on?
-	- Is it dependent on how many customers use a particular Oracle?
-	- Is it dependent on how long a customer has used our Oracles?
-	- Is it dependent on the type of data the Oracle is broadcasting?
-	- Is it dependent on the Oracle Spread / Oracle Expiration Time of the Oracle?
-	- Does the price differ if the customer is also a Light Feed?
-	- Does the price differ between the Medianizer and Oracle Security Module? What if a customer wants both?
-	- Are fees waived for certain classes of customers? Why?
-	- Are prices dependent on what our competitors charge?
+    - Is it based on a strategy to grow the customer base?
+    - Is it based on a strategy to reign in costs to a more sustainable business model?
+    - Is it based on a loss-leader strategy to strengthen the brand of the Maker Protocol?
+    - How are prices applied across different Oracles and different customers?
+    - Is it a flat-fee applied uniformly across every Oracle and customer?
+    - Is it applied to how much value a customer derives from the Oracle?
+    - Is it dependent on how many Oracles a customer is whitelisted on?
+    - Is it dependent on how many customers use a particular Oracle?
+    - Is it dependent on how long a customer has used our Oracles?
+    - Is it dependent on the type of data the Oracle is broadcasting?
+    - Is it dependent on the Oracle Spread / Oracle Expiration Time of the Oracle?
+    - Does the price differ if the customer is also a Light Feed?
+    - Does the price differ between the Medianizer and Oracle Security Module? What if a customer wants both?
+    - Are fees waived for certain classes of customers? Why?
+    - Are prices dependent on what our competitors charge?
 - How many customers are expected to be lost or gained due to this change in pricing?
 
 ### Supporting Data

MIP10/MIP10c14-Subproposals/MIP10c14-SP1.md

@@ -57,5 +57,5 @@ Apart from Kyber Network, the various founders have been involved in:
 The Kyber team have gained valuable experience building one of the largest liquidity providers to the DeFi space over the last three years, and their addition as a stakeholder to the trustless Oracles further contributes to the strengthening of the expertise and know-how within the MakerDAO ecosystem.
 
 ### Changelog
-	- reformatted preamble
-	- added disclaimer
+    - reformatted preamble
+    - added disclaimer

MIP10/MIP10c14-Subproposals/MIP10c14-SP2.md

@@ -55,5 +55,5 @@ Infura has always been a free service for developers to get an easy entry into E
 Infura will be a trusted addition to the existing oracle light feed providers. Our reputation will add to the already robust group of stakeholders.
 
 ### Changelog
-	- reformatted preamble
-	- added disclaimer
+    - reformatted preamble
+    - added disclaimer

MIP10/MIP10c14-Subproposals/MIP10c14-SP3.md

@@ -54,5 +54,5 @@ The leading Ethereum Block explorer, analytics and api service provider for the
 As a Light Feed we believe our ethos of neutrality and impartiality will help in providing a reliable source of pricing data.
 
 ### Changelog
-	- reformatted preamble
-	- added disclaimer
+    - reformatted preamble
+    - added disclaimer

MIP10/MIP10c14-Subproposals/MIP10c14-SP4.md

@@ -65,5 +65,5 @@ We will be faithful & responsible stewards of the data passed into the MKR Oracl
 Note that DAI/SAI are some of the most used tokens on the Gitcoin platform!  We have a rational economic incentive to keep the price data clean & good!  https://gitcoin.co/leaderboard/tokens?cadence=quarterly&keyword=all&product=all
 
 ### Changelog
-	- reformatted preamble
-	- added disclaimer
+    - reformatted preamble
+    - added disclaimer

MIP10/MIP10c15-Subproposal-Template.md

@@ -45,10 +45,10 @@ Date Ratified: <yyyy-mm-dd>
 **Verification** 
 - Were sufficient public-facing resources provided or found that confirm the information in the application?
 - Was the applicant honest with respect to:
-	- the investors
-	- how much funding was raised
-	- the number of employees
-	- the location of incorporation & domicile
+    - the investors
+    - how much funding was raised
+    - the number of employees
+    - the location of incorporation & domicile
 - Given the applicant's major investors, is there a risk adding this Light Feed would give a single investor too much influence over the Oracle protocol?
 - Given the incorporation and domicile location of the organization, is there a risk adding this Light Feed would give a single jurisdiction too much influence over the Oracle protocol?
 

MIP10/MIP10c15-Subproposals/MIP10c15-SP1.md

@@ -116,5 +116,5 @@ Yes.
 The Oracle Team recommends that Maker Governance ratify the proposal to appoint Kyber Network as a Light Feed for the Maker Oracles. Kyber Network has a strong brand and reputation in the ecosystem which are the primary requirements to look for in a potential Feed partner. The Oracle Team was able to verify the information provided by Deniz Omer in the MIP10c14 Light Feed application through government public records and cursory googling. No confirmed cases of misconduct related to the organization were found.
 
 ### Changelog
-	- reformatted preamble
-	- added disclaimer
+    - reformatted preamble
+    - added disclaimer

MIP10/MIP10c15-Subproposals/MIP10c15-SP2.md

@@ -114,5 +114,5 @@ Yes.
 The Oracle Team recommends that Maker Governance ratify the proposal to appoint Infura as a Light Feed for the Maker Oracles. Infura's reputation within the industry as the backbone of connectivity to the Ethereum blockchain, present in everyday services like MetaMask, makes them a clear favorite to partner with to decentralize and secure Maker’s Oracles. Being owned by Consensys, itself founded and led by Ethereum cofounder Joe Lubin, just further cements the trustworthiness of Infura. The Oracle Team was able to verify the claims made by Infura in their application.
 
 ### Changelog
-	- reformatted preamble
-	- added disclaimer
+    - reformatted preamble
+    - added disclaimer

MIP10/MIP10c15-Subproposals/MIP10c15-SP3.md

@@ -71,9 +71,9 @@ Yes, public records were able to verify most of the provided information.
 - the investors
 
 The Oracle Team was able to verify Etherscan:   
-	as a portfolio company on the [BoostVC website](https://www.boost.vc/portfolio).   
-	as a portfolio company on the [Digital Currency Group (DCG) website](https://dcg.co/portfolio/).   
-	as a portfolio company on the [Coinbase Ventures website](https://ventures.coinbase.com/).   
+    as a portfolio company on the [BoostVC website](https://www.boost.vc/portfolio).   
+    as a portfolio company on the [Digital Currency Group (DCG) website](https://dcg.co/portfolio/).   
+    as a portfolio company on the [Coinbase Ventures website](https://ventures.coinbase.com/).   
 
 - how much funding was raised
 
@@ -117,5 +117,5 @@ The Oracle Team recommends that Maker Governance ratify the proposal to appoint
 Having provided the infrastructure for a compelling web of decentralization and transparency of Ethereum since as far back as 2015, Etherscan has cemented itself as a core member of the Ethereum ecosystem that embodies its values. The Oracle Team was able to verify most of the information provided by Elvis in the MIP10c14 Light Feed application however was unable to confirm the amount of funding raised nor the existance of the legal entity in the claimed domicile.  No confirmed cases of misconduct related to the organization were found.
 
 ### Changelog
-	- reformatted preamble
-	- added disclaimer
+    - reformatted preamble
+    - added disclaimer

MIP10/MIP10c15-Subproposals/MIP10c15-SP4.md

@@ -53,10 +53,10 @@ Yes. Gitcoin dates back to 2017 and has had a strong presensce within the ecosys
 - What contributions has this organization made to the crypto ecosystem?
 
 Most notably it has created a coordination platform for sustainable funding for open source initiatives. This is critical for the Ethereum community which is based on the principles of open source and distributed work between remote entities. Gitcoin Grants provide a unique combination of benefits including:
-	empowering developers to monetize their open source contributions    
-	enabling projects to incentivize developers to learn and hack on their platform    
-	allowing employers to vet potential candidates through real deliverables    
-	creating a method for crowdsourcing features and applications desired by a community     
+    empowering developers to monetize their open source contributions    
+    enabling projects to incentivize developers to learn and hack on their platform    
+    allowing employers to vet potential candidates through real deliverables    
+    creating a method for crowdsourcing features and applications desired by a community     
 
 - Would including the organization as a Light Feed instill a sense of trust in the Oracles?
 
@@ -120,5 +120,5 @@ The Oracle Team recommends that Maker Governance ratify the proposal to appoint
 Gitcoin is an established member of the Ethereum tribe on a mission to create sustainable funding for open source. Dai is an integral part of the Gitcoin platform. Since its inception grants totalling $2,214,536 Sai/Dai have been awarded accounting for over 70% of all awarded grants. There is a clear alignement of incentives between Gitcoin providing trusted pricing data to the MakerDAO Oracles and Gitcoin's dominating use of Dai on its platform. The Oracle Team was able to verify most of the information provided by Kevin in the MIP10c14 Light Feed application. No confirmed cases of misconduct related to the organization were found.
 
 ### Changelog
-	- reformatted preamble
-	- added disclaimer
+    - reformatted preamble
+    - added disclaimer

MIP10/MIP10c15-Subproposals/MIP10c15-SP5.md

@@ -66,13 +66,13 @@ Yes Argent provided numerous sources backed by credible organizations.
 
 - Was the applicant honest with respect to:
    - the investors  
-	- how much funding was raised
+    - how much funding was raised
 
          The Oracle Team found over a dozen sources via a simple [Google Search](https://www.google.com/search?q=argent+series+A&oq=argent+series+A&aqs=chrome..69i57.6186j1j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8) confirming the investors as well as the amount raised
-	- the number of employees
+    - the number of employees
 
          The Oracle Team found [25 individuals on LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/search/results/people/?facetCurrentCompany=%5B%2211414677%22%5D) claiming to have current or past associations with Argent. 
-	- the location of incorporation & domicile
+    - the location of incorporation & domicile
 
       The Oracle Team was able to confirm the existence of Argent Labs Limited registered in the United Kingdom at address 9th Floor 107 Cheapside, London, United Kingdom, EC2V 6DN through the [U.K. Companies House Register](https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/11093638) with Company Number 11093638 and registered on 4 December 2017 as stated in Argent's application.
 

MIP10/MIP10c15-Subproposals/MIP10c15-SP6.md

@@ -68,11 +68,11 @@ It's important to acknowledge the team behind MyEtherWallet team transitioned to
 The Oracle Team was able to identify the existence of the Delaware C Corp MyCrypto through the [Delaware Division of Corporations Register](https://icis.corp.delaware.gov/ecorp/entitysearch/NameSearch.aspx) with file number 6673533 and registered on 12/6/2017. There is a minor discrepancy here as the applicant claimed to be incorporated in 2018
 
 - Was the applicant honest with respect to:
-	- the investors
+    - the investors
         The Oracle Team was able to confirm the investors from both the source provided by the applicant as well as external sources including [Polychain](https://jobs.polychain.capital/companies), [ShapeShift](https://www.crunchbase.com/funding_round/mycrypto-series-a--d1c7877a#section-investors), [BoostVC](https://www.boost.vc/portfolio), [Ausum Ventures](https://www.ausum.vc/portfolio), [Albert Ni](https://www.crunchbase.com/person/albert-ni#section-overview), [Mick Hagen](https://www.crunchbase.com/person/mick-hagen#section-overview), [Chance Du](https://www.crunchbase.com/person/chance-du#section-overview), and [Lily Liu](https://www.crunchbase.com/person/lily-liu-0251#section-personal-investments)
-	- how much funding was raised
-	- the number of employees
-	- the location of incorporation & domicile
+    - how much funding was raised
+    - the number of employees
+    - the location of incorporation & domicile
 
 - Given the applicant's major investors, is there a risk adding this Light Feed would give a single investor too much influence over the Oracle protocol?
 The Oracle Team does not see any conflict of interest arising from amount of influence any single investor may have.

MIP10/MIP10c16-Subproposal-Template.md

@@ -32,6 +32,6 @@ Date Ratified: <yyyy-mm-dd>
       - Feed is proven to attempt or succeeded in buying / selling the Feed.
       - Institution backing a Light Feed is proven to engage in dishonest behavior
       - A Dark Feed's identity is doxed in the public domain
-    				
+                    
 ### Relevant Information
 -  Links to evidence further backing the motivation behind the removal of the Oracle.