Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create NumFocus-affiliated-projects.md #29

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Create NumFocus-affiliated-projects.md #29

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
45 changes: 45 additions & 0 deletions decisions/NumFocus-affiliated-projects.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
---
# Configuration for the Jekyll template "Just the Docs"
parent: Decisions
nav_order: 1
title: Template
layout: home

# These are optional elements. Feel free to remove any of them.
# status: {proposed | rejected | accepted | deprecated | … | superseded by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md)}
# date: {YYYY-MM-DD when the decision was last updated}
# deciders: {list everyone involved in the decision}
# consulted: {list everyone whose opinions are sought (typically subject-matter experts); and with whom there is a two-way communication}
# informed: {list everyone who is kept up-to-date on progress; and with whom there is a one-way communication}
---
<!-- we need to disable MD025, because we use the different heading "ADR Template" in the homepage (see above) than it is foreseen in the template -->
<!-- markdownlint-disable-next-line MD025 -->
# Apply for affiliated-projects within NumFocus

## Context and Problem Statement
Being part of NumFocus has a few advantages: 1) financial support 2) increased exposure in the community 3) being part of a wider ecosystem.

We can use the small development grant to run workshops.

## Considered Options

### Apply collectively as MP or individually for each library
We agree it's better to apply collectively for the reasons below:
1) users generally use MP codes as a whole
2) it requires less sustained application efforts
3) there are precedence where a collection of codes is an affiliated project and apply for seperate funding for individual development effort

### Interests in participation from individual libraries
We tentatively assume all MP codes are included unless maintainers of specific libraries want to opt out.

## Decision Outcome



## Implementation Plan
- @yang-ruoxi will inquire NumFocus about their guidelines
- Once hear back, a subcomittee of interested parties can draft an application before Jan 15 2025


## More Information
https://numfocus.org/sponsored-projects/affiliated-projects