Add ARM64 Support and Optimize Build Process

[danielchristianschroeter]

This pull request introduces ARM64 platform support to the MGOB project, enhancing cross-platform compatibility and broadening its usability across diverse architectures. Key updates include:

1. ARM64 Integration:

   • Updated Docker configurations to support both linux/amd64 and linux/arm64 platforms.
   • Modified the build processes to recognize and correctly handle the ARM64 architecture, ensuring smooth deployment and execution.

2. Workflow and Build Optimization:

   • Improved the CI/CD pipeline by updating GitHub workflows for more efficient builds, leveraging newer versions of the action tools for better performance and stability.
   • Refactored scripts (build.sh) to dynamically determine architecture and execute conditional installations of dependencies like RClone, MinIO, and cloud SDKs (Azure, AWS, Google Cloud) based on environment variables.
   • Enhanced Dockerfiles to streamline multistage builds and leverage architectural-specific optimizations.

3. Dependency Updates:

   • Bumped versions for key dependencies across Dockerfiles for enhanced security and feature improvements. This includes updated versions of Azure CLI, Google Cloud SDK, etc.

4. Codebase Refactoring:

   • Cleaned up redundant code and streamlined build scripts for easier maintenance.
   • Adjusted commands and configurations to align with best practices.

5. Successful Build and Deployment Demonstrations:

   • Verified the updates with successful build actions:
     • Dev-build
     • Releases
     • Mongo Tool Build
   • Finalized and deployed Docker images, accessible at:
     • Mongo Tool on Docker Hub
     • MGOB on Docker Hub

This implementation addresses and resolves Issue #116. Your feedback and suggestions are welcome to further refine MGOB's functionalities and compatibility.

[maxisam]

@danielchristianschroeter Thanks for making this PR, I reverted the docker build in the workflow. It shouldn't push before going through the test.

[maxisam]

nvm, there is an issue of load with multi-platform

docker/buildx#59

[maxisam]

I just removed ARM docker build before test. But to be honest, if we really wanna ensure it works, we probably should use M1 runner? It will be a bigger change for the workflow I think

[danielchristianschroeter]

I just removed ARM docker build before test. But to be honest, if we really wanna ensure it works, we probably should use M1 runner? It will be a bigger change for the workflow I think

M1 isn't typically used in server environments, it may not be the optimal solution for our needs. It might be more efficient to utilize existing ARM-compatible CI/CD tools to ensure our builds are properly tested across ARM architecture. This approach could maintain our current workflow with minimal disruption while still achieving reliable testing.