df-apr more wording #4668
Merged
df-apr more wording #4668
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It can mostly just refer to df-apr now that we have that.
As discussed on github . The idea is that using the word difference might make it clearer, and also that we shouldn't say it is an apartness relation when there are conditions to that.
icecream17
approved these changes
Feb 23, 2025
|
Doesn't seem to be much reason to keep this one open for further review, but as usual feel free to make and issue or a follow up pull request if you see anything. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This contains two wording fixes as follow ups to #4664 .
The first is described at #4664 (comment) and concerns how we describe
df-apr.The second is the mmil.html entry for
df-drngand reflects the existence ofdf-apras well as what we have learned about local rings.