Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: Don't run QNS when a PR is merged #2161

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 9, 2024

Conversation

larseggert
Copy link
Collaborator

Also don't run it on a schedule anymore.

Also don't run it on a schedule anymore.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.38%. Comparing base (5677bd1) to head (deadb43).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2161      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.39%   95.38%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         112      112              
  Lines       36373    36373              
==========================================
- Hits        34697    34696       -1     
- Misses       1676     1677       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 8, 2024

Failed Interop Tests

QUIC Interop Runner, client vs. server

neqo-latest as client

neqo-latest as server

All results

Succeeded Interop Tests

QUIC Interop Runner, client vs. server

neqo-latest as client

neqo-latest as server

Unsupported Interop Tests

QUIC Interop Runner, client vs. server

neqo-latest as client

neqo-latest as server

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 8, 2024

Benchmark results

Performance differences relative to 5677bd1.

coalesce_acked_from_zero 1+1 entries: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [98.591 ns 98.894 ns 99.212 ns]
       change: [-0.3848% +0.0637% +0.5182%] (p = 0.78 > 0.05)

Found 11 outliers among 100 measurements (11.00%)
7 (7.00%) high mild
4 (4.00%) high severe

coalesce_acked_from_zero 3+1 entries: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [116.42 ns 116.65 ns 116.91 ns]
       change: [-0.2102% +0.1014% +0.4298%] (p = 0.54 > 0.05)

Found 15 outliers among 100 measurements (15.00%)
1 (1.00%) low severe
2 (2.00%) low mild
4 (4.00%) high mild
8 (8.00%) high severe

coalesce_acked_from_zero 10+1 entries: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [116.02 ns 116.37 ns 116.81 ns]
       change: [-0.5855% -0.2218% +0.0999%] (p = 0.22 > 0.05)

Found 10 outliers among 100 measurements (10.00%)
4 (4.00%) low severe
1 (1.00%) low mild
2 (2.00%) high mild
3 (3.00%) high severe

coalesce_acked_from_zero 1000+1 entries: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [97.029 ns 97.152 ns 97.290 ns]
       change: [-1.7601% -0.7178% +0.2105%] (p = 0.19 > 0.05)

Found 10 outliers among 100 measurements (10.00%)
2 (2.00%) high mild
8 (8.00%) high severe

RxStreamOrderer::inbound_frame(): Change within noise threshold.
       time:   [111.93 ms 111.99 ms 112.06 ms]
       change: [+0.6444% +0.7286% +0.8087%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)

Found 16 outliers among 100 measurements (16.00%)
7 (7.00%) low mild
4 (4.00%) high mild
5 (5.00%) high severe

transfer/pacing-false/varying-seeds: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [26.670 ms 27.713 ms 28.767 ms]
       change: [-1.7805% +3.1823% +8.2352%] (p = 0.22 > 0.05)

Found 1 outliers among 100 measurements (1.00%)
1 (1.00%) high mild

transfer/pacing-true/varying-seeds: 💔 Performance has regressed.
       time:   [37.317 ms 39.120 ms 40.945 ms]
       change: [+4.0937% +11.492% +19.058%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
transfer/pacing-false/same-seed: Change within noise threshold.
       time:   [27.110 ms 27.881 ms 28.672 ms]
       change: [+2.1107% +6.1447% +10.958%] (p = 0.01 < 0.05)

Found 2 outliers among 100 measurements (2.00%)
2 (2.00%) high mild

transfer/pacing-true/same-seed: Change within noise threshold.
       time:   [42.846 ms 44.882 ms 46.974 ms]
       change: [+0.5146% +7.4912% +14.984%] (p = 0.03 < 0.05)
1-conn/1-100mb-resp (aka. Download)/client: 💔 Performance has regressed.
       time:   [115.35 ms 115.79 ms 116.21 ms]
       thrpt:  [860.51 MiB/s 863.62 MiB/s 866.91 MiB/s]
change:
       time:   [+1.2680% +1.7475% +2.2566%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
       thrpt:  [-2.2068% -1.7175% -1.2521%]

Found 2 outliers among 100 measurements (2.00%)
2 (2.00%) low mild

1-conn/10_000-parallel-1b-resp (aka. RPS)/client: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [317.83 ms 321.27 ms 324.69 ms]
       thrpt:  [30.799 Kelem/s 31.126 Kelem/s 31.464 Kelem/s]
change:
       time:   [-0.3420% +1.2784% +2.7536%] (p = 0.12 > 0.05)
       thrpt:  [-2.6798% -1.2623% +0.3432%]
1-conn/1-1b-resp (aka. HPS)/client: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [33.986 ms 34.205 ms 34.451 ms]
       thrpt:  [29.027  elem/s 29.236  elem/s 29.424  elem/s]
change:
       time:   [-0.6219% +0.1458% +0.9559%] (p = 0.72 > 0.05)
       thrpt:  [-0.9469% -0.1456% +0.6258%]

Found 7 outliers among 100 measurements (7.00%)
1 (1.00%) high mild
6 (6.00%) high severe

Client/server transfer results

Transfer of 33554432 bytes over loopback.

Client Server CC Pacing Mean [ms] Min [ms] Max [ms] Relative
msquic msquic 165.1 ± 98.0 98.6 391.6 1.00
neqo msquic reno on 249.9 ± 82.4 208.6 463.2 1.00
neqo msquic reno 240.8 ± 54.1 211.3 408.4 1.00
neqo msquic cubic on 242.4 ± 61.4 204.5 441.6 1.00
neqo msquic cubic 259.0 ± 77.1 209.2 433.7 1.00
msquic neqo reno on 148.5 ± 81.0 86.3 321.0 1.00
msquic neqo reno 167.3 ± 112.6 87.1 472.5 1.00
msquic neqo cubic on 146.8 ± 97.0 82.6 435.1 1.00
msquic neqo cubic 150.8 ± 100.0 85.4 483.6 1.00
neqo neqo reno on 219.5 ± 107.8 133.2 471.2 1.00
neqo neqo reno 199.0 ± 81.6 133.1 425.5 1.00
neqo neqo cubic on 224.2 ± 106.7 131.2 431.0 1.00
neqo neqo cubic 187.9 ± 83.2 129.6 459.3 1.00

⬇️ Download logs

Copy link
Collaborator

@mxinden mxinden left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fine with not running on closed pr and scheduled, but wonder whether we should keep push.

.github/workflows/qns.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@larseggert larseggert added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 9, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to no response for status checks Oct 9, 2024
@larseggert larseggert added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 9, 2024
Merged via the queue into mozilla:main with commit 5f8d876 Oct 9, 2024
57 of 64 checks passed
@larseggert larseggert deleted the ci-no-qns-on-merge branch October 9, 2024 14:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants