Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: add "returns" documentation to functions.py #1331

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 7, 2024

Conversation

marenwestermann
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)

  • πŸ’Ύ Refactor
  • ✨ Feature
  • πŸ› Bug Fix
  • πŸ”§ Optimization
  • πŸ“ Documentation
  • βœ… Test
  • 🐳 Other

Related issues

Checklist

  • Code follows style guide (ruff)
  • Tests added
  • Documented the changes

If you have comments or can explain your changes, please do so below.

I wasn't sure if more documentation should be added to the function get_level (see here). It's public but it's not really part of the "core functionality".

@github-actions github-actions bot added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Nov 6, 2024
Copy link
Member

@MarcoGorelli MarcoGorelli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yay, thanks @marenwestermann ! just tried building this locally and it looks good πŸ‘Œ

@MarcoGorelli MarcoGorelli merged commit d78150b into narwhals-dev:main Nov 7, 2024
22 checks passed
MarcoGorelli pushed a commit to MarcoGorelli/narwhals that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2024
* add returns documentation

* add documentation to v1
@marenwestermann marenwestermann deleted the docs-functions branch November 7, 2024 18:06
@marenwestermann
Copy link
Contributor Author

So cute! 😍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants