Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: dask expr len method #762

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 9, 2024
Merged

feat: dask expr len method #762

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 9, 2024

Conversation

FBruzzesi
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)

  • πŸ’Ύ Refactor
  • ✨ Feature
  • πŸ› Bug Fix
  • πŸ”§ Optimization
  • πŸ“ Documentation
  • βœ… Test
  • 🐳 Other

Related issues

Checklist

  • Code follows style guide (ruff)
  • Tests added
  • Documented the changes

@github-actions github-actions bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 9, 2024
compare_dicts(df, expected)


def test_len_len_chaining(constructor: Any, request: Any) -> None:
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Renamed this test, and keep failing for dask as .filter is not implemented. Wondering if that's ok to implement even in the sad case that we do not move forward with #743 .

At the end, I think expr.filter is mainly use to filter within a context and then aggregate (exactly as in the test here)

Copy link
Member

@MarcoGorelli MarcoGorelli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks @FBruzzesi !

@FBruzzesi FBruzzesi merged commit 41489aa into main Aug 9, 2024
23 checks passed
@FBruzzesi FBruzzesi deleted the feat/dask-expr-len branch August 9, 2024 17:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants