Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Improve CI #179

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from
Closed

Improve CI #179

wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

snaselj
Copy link
Contributor

@snaselj snaselj commented Oct 6, 2023

Closes: NaN

Optimize CI time.

What's Changed

  • Bumped CI image version to ubuntu-22.04.
  • Bumped CI uses versions to the latest major version each.

To Do

  • Explanation of Change(s)
  • Added change log fragment(s) (for more information see the documentation)
  • Attached Screenshots, Payload Example
  • Unit, Integration Tests
  • Documentation Updates (when adding/changing features)
  • Example Plugin Updates (when adding/changing features)
  • Outline Remaining Work, Constraints from Design

@snaselj snaselj force-pushed the u/snaselj-improve-ci branch 5 times, most recently from fab76f8 to 142bed0 Compare October 16, 2023 09:02
@snaselj snaselj deleted the branch drift-manager/pr January 4, 2024 13:37
@snaselj snaselj closed this Jan 4, 2024
@jdrew82 jdrew82 deleted the u/snaselj-improve-ci branch July 17, 2024 16:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@itdependsnetworks itdependsnetworks Awaiting requested review from itdependsnetworks itdependsnetworks will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review itdependsnetworks is a code owner

@jdrew82 jdrew82 Awaiting requested review from jdrew82 jdrew82 will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review jdrew82 is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@snaselj @whitej6