Patch to fix Issue #4 by altering the license to Apache 2.0 in the code #9
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hi Robin, this is actually a good question. The API we implement here is ASLv2. The implementation uses the Neo4j Java APIs directly, that's why it's GPLv3. Let me discuss the best solution for this internally. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@jexp - you may want to check the contents of the ApacheLicense-2.0-header.txt file.
Should this mention the contributor license agreement?
Note that the first round of changes (4 commits) were made through the GitHub web client and I haven't subsequently squashed them into a single commit.