Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Undistortion should not occur for already-undistorted images #2726
Undistortion should not occur for already-undistorted images #2726
Changes from 3 commits
b0d4d60
566d670
5caeadc
7fb3d2a
fd39a3a
2ac5c33
3636b81
a4f4f36
cebe370
fb512fe
8819ea4
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change wouldn't be compatible with other features (mask, depth_image). I would suggest to check
np.any(distortion_params)
and if False, return the original K and image without triggering cv2 functions. Something like below should workThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
BTW, I found the following lines are problematic, roi was calculated for undistorted images, not the original image/mask. Should be deleted maybe.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great catch. Fixed.
Per the other comment - I removed the lines for the mask, because indeed it occurs twice in the code. I left the depth as is.