Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Licence field in package.json to match LICENSE file #127

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 11, 2023

Conversation

stevehanson
Copy link
Contributor

@stevehanson stevehanson commented Sep 8, 2023

In the package.json, this project had "license": "New Relic", which is not a valid license type that I'm aware of. I am working on a mobile app for an enterprise client that does dependency analysis to ensure all of our dependencies are permissable for use in their organization, and the tool flagged this project due to the unrecognized license.

This PR just updates the field to be "Apache-2.0" to match the license specified in the LICENSE file.

In the `package.json`, this project had `"license": "New Relic"`, which is not a valid license type. I am working on a mobile app for an enterprise client that does dependency analysis to ensure all of our dependencies are permissable for use in their organization, and the tool flagged this project due to the unrecognized license.

This PR just updates the field to be "Apache-2.0" to match the license specified in the [LICENSE](./LICENSE) file.
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Sep 8, 2023

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@ndesai-newrelic
Copy link
Contributor

@stevehanson can you sign CLA ?

@stevehanson
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ndesai-newrelic yes, I have now signed the CLA, thanks!

@ndesai-newrelic ndesai-newrelic merged commit a195907 into newrelic:main Sep 11, 2023
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants