Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

buffer: correctly apply prototype to cloned File / Blob #55138

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 28, 2024

Conversation

RedYetiDev
Copy link
Member

Followup #47613
Reference #55067


The prototype of the transferred File / Blob should be equal to it's closest transferable superclass. This PR applies the same change as #55067 did to Streams to Files and Blobs.

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. label Sep 26, 2024
@RedYetiDev RedYetiDev added buffer Issues and PRs related to the buffer subsystem. web-standards Issues and PRs related to Web APIs labels Sep 26, 2024
@RedYetiDev RedYetiDev added author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. labels Sep 26, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Sep 26, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.23%. Comparing base (812806a) to head (f2dc258).
Report is 75 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #55138      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.24%   88.23%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         651      651              
  Lines      183905   183907       +2     
  Branches    35864    35866       +2     
==========================================
- Hits       162286   162279       -7     
- Misses      14905    14911       +6     
- Partials     6714     6717       +3     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
lib/internal/blob.js 99.80% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
lib/internal/file.js 97.36% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

... and 23 files with indirect coverage changes

@aduh95 aduh95 added the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Sep 27, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Sep 28, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot merged commit f805d0b into nodejs:main Sep 28, 2024
68 checks passed
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Landed in f805d0b

@targos targos added dont-land-on-v18.x PRs that should not land on the v18.x-staging branch and should not be released in v18.x. dont-land-on-v20.x PRs that should not land on the v20.x-staging branch and should not be released in v20.x. dont-land-on-v22.x PRs that should not land on the v22.x-staging branch and should not be released in v22.x. labels Oct 4, 2024
louwers pushed a commit to louwers/node that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2024
PR-URL: nodejs#55138
Reviewed-By: Vinícius Lourenço Claro Cardoso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. buffer Issues and PRs related to the buffer subsystem. dont-land-on-v18.x PRs that should not land on the v18.x-staging branch and should not be released in v18.x. dont-land-on-v20.x PRs that should not land on the v20.x-staging branch and should not be released in v20.x. dont-land-on-v22.x PRs that should not land on the v22.x-staging branch and should not be released in v22.x. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. web-standards Issues and PRs related to Web APIs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants