Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Filled in section 1.1 to describe the changes #668

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 8, 2023

Conversation

sthagen
Copy link
Contributor

@sthagen sthagen commented Dec 8, 2023

The title says it all

@tschmidtb51
Copy link
Contributor

Related to #663

@tschmidtb51 tschmidtb51 self-requested a review December 8, 2023 16:17
@sthagen sthagen requested review from tschmidtb51 and removed request for tschmidtb51 December 8, 2023 16:17
@sthagen sthagen added the editorial mostly nits and consistency label Dec 8, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@tschmidtb51 tschmidtb51 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please see my comments

csaf_2.0_errata_01/index.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@sthagen
Copy link
Contributor Author

sthagen commented Dec 8, 2023

After merging these changes a zip file created from the folder contents should be attached to a release.

The tag should be csaf-v2.0-errata01-csd01.

Then I upload to kavi (the URL of the zip file) and replace in below motion the magic location with the kavi link.

@tschmidtb51 Next someone should write an email motion (essentially two) as per:

I move that the TC approve Common Security Advisory Framework Version 2.0 Errata 01 and all associated artifacts packaged together in csaf-2_0-errata-01-csd-01-20231208-rc1.zip as an Errata Draft to Common Security Advisory Framework Version 2.0 OASIS Standard approved on 18 November 2022 and confirm that the errata corrections do not constitute Substantive Changes to the Standard.

I further move that the TC approve submitting Common Security Advisory Framework Version 2.0 Errata 01 contained in csaf-2_0-errata-01-csd-01-20231208-rc1.zip for 15 day public review.​

Co-authored-by: tschmidtb51 <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@tschmidtb51 tschmidtb51 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tschmidtb51 tschmidtb51 merged commit 00634fe into master Dec 8, 2023
10 checks passed
@sthagen
Copy link
Contributor Author

sthagen commented Dec 8, 2023

I sent the following motion to the tc list as:

Dear members,

I hereby submit the following motion and request that if seconded and no objection received per this list before one week has passed on 2023-12-15T18:00:00Z to automatically carry. The Chair will of course subsequently state the result per mail to this list when the period has passed. The motion can be superseded by a TC meeting with quorum within the period mentioned above.

Stefan Hagen moves that the TC approve Common Security Advisory Framework Version 2.0 Errata 01 and all associated artifacts packaged together in csaf-2_0-errata-01-csd-01-20231208-rc1.zip as an Errata Draft to Common Security Advisory Framework Version 2.0 OASIS Standard approved on 18 November 2022 and confirm that the errata corrections do not constitute Substantive Changes to the Standard.

Stefan Hagen further moves that the TC approve submitting Common Security Advisory Framework Version 2.0 Errata 01 contained in csaf-2_0-errata-01-csd-01-20231208-rc1.zip for 15 day public review.

SHA256 Checksums

Archive

fcce65c3905cd9685662f632313d608b5d345743db033241c52a56e71069bf48 csaf-2_0-errata-01-csd-01-20231208-rc1.zip
`

Included Artifacts

6e76b27b9552168e756f4b1c8be0a9d43414338ee44793e55357869b86031242 aggregator_json_schema.json
29c114b35b0a30831f1674f2ab8b3ed9b2890cfeaa63b924ac6ed9d70ef44262 csaf_json_schema.json
716db1494b4843ae7ea7328122a1ff77387a728446b57c90950026581630e634 index.md
0270d0cfadf5202ff83a63502012a407e0e8ec3194a07296f13641c9f5630aba provider_json_schema.json

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
editorial mostly nits and consistency
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants