-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 490
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding mfa screens #9542
base: form-field-v1
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Adding mfa screens #9542
Conversation
…into issue/ohcnetwork#9456/mfa-screens
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new authentication route and component for multi-factor authentication (MFA) in the application. A new route Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Closes #9456 |
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/components/Auth/Authenticate.tsx (3)
39-49
: Use optional chaining for safer property access
Instead of “logo && logo.light”, you can do “logo?.light” to reduce verbosity and avoid potential undefined errors.- {logos.map((logo, index) => - logo && logo.light ? ( + {logos.map((logo, index) => + logo?.light ? (🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 40-40: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
145-155
: Consider optional chaining for dark logo
Instead of “logo && logo.dark”, use “logo?.dark” for succinctness and resilience.- logo && logo.dark ? ( + logo?.dark ? (🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 145-145: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
187-187
: Spelling fix: remove duplicate "by"
Currently reads “Enter code generated by by your…”. Remove the extra “by”.- Enter code generated by by your 2-factor auth app + Enter code generated by your 2-factor auth app
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/Routers/SessionRouter.tsx
(2 hunks)src/components/Auth/Authenticate.tsx
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/components/Auth/Authenticate.tsx
[error] 40-40: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 145-145: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 73-73: Avoid passing content using the dangerouslySetInnerHTML prop.
Setting content using code can expose users to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks
(lint/security/noDangerouslySetInnerHtml)
[error] 207-211: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.
(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/Routers/SessionRouter.tsx (2)
4-4
: Import for authenticate route looks good
No adverse impact on the file.
67-67
: Route definition for “/authenticate” is valid
The new route integrates seamlessly with existing routes. Ensure you have tested navigation and protected access if necessary.
Proposed Changes
Fixes #9456
Closes #9456
Resolves #9456
@ohcnetwork/care-fe-code-reviewers
Merge Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
"/authenticate"
for user login.Authenticate
component that provides a user-friendly authentication interface with multiple login methods.Accessibility Enhancements
Closes #9456