Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add TXTDirect's gometa article #10

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

erbesharat
Copy link
Member

Add an article about how to setup and monitor Go packages using TXTDirect and Prometheus.

Notes:
Not sure what else we need to cover to make the article more suitable for general readers who are not familiar with TXTDirect. Any suggestions?
Also, any ideas for the ending? Wasn't sure how we should end the article and what additional resources we should mention.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Dec 11, 2019

DeepCode Report (#15d27e)

DeepCode analyzed this pull request.
There are no new issues.

@stp-ip
Copy link
Member

stp-ip commented Dec 11, 2019

Why the specific choice to explain both vanity imports and metrics?
Would it be easier for the user to understand one at a time.
Aka Go imports via TXTDirect with just a domain and DNS TXT record and use TXTDirect to monitor incoming requests for things such as go imports etc. (could link to the first one)

@stp-ip
Copy link
Member

stp-ip commented Dec 11, 2019

The conclusion could probably point to txtdirect.com or a small example on how to set up gometa without hosting TXTDirect yourself and using our txtd.io endpoint instead.

@stp-ip
Copy link
Member

stp-ip commented Dec 11, 2019

Overall good. A few things. Still think a split from metrics and gometa might make sense.
And a few things might be able to be rephrased, can add a few more comments inline, if you want.

@stp-ip
Copy link
Member

stp-ip commented Apr 21, 2020

Let's rebase on latest master. Will do an inline review afterwards. Happy to get more posts out :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants